gcc-snapshot_20060323-1_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-snapshot_20060323-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20060323.orig.tar.gz
gcc-snapshot_20060323-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20060323-1_powerpc.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRI
Accepted:
gcc-snapshot_20060323-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060323-1.diff.gz
gcc-snapshot_20060323-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060323-1.dsc
gcc-snapshot_20060323-1_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-snapshot/gcc-snapshot_20060323-1_powerpc.deb
gcc-sn
Package: g++-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
G++ seems to drop const int arrays, while gcc compiles them correctly.
See the following example of the two attached files:
gcc -Wall -c gen_array.c
gcc -Wall -o gen_array gen_array.o
./gen_array > array.cc
g++ -Wall -o array.cc.o -c array.
Package: libmudflap0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: important
Simple threaded or non-threaded C++ programs with bound violation
are caught (if not threaded) by -fmudflap, but not by -fmudflapth.
mudflapth is not functioning.
Example with a simple non-threaded program:
$ cat test.cpp
int m
Dear gcc/binutils maintainers,
During bootstrap of gcc-4.0 (4.0.3-1 Debian) on ARM
with VFP (--with-float=soft, --with-fpu=vfp) and binutils
2.16.1cvs20060117-1.my I stumbled upon the following issue. The
linkage of libgcc_s.so.1 fails because of multiple errors such as:
"ld: *_s.o uses VFP ins
Markus Schaber wrote:
> G++ seems to drop const int arrays, while gcc compiles them correctly.
The bug occurs for every data type, also double or struct arrays.
The .o file just does not contain the array:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/gcc4bug$ objdump -C -t array.c.o
array.c.o: file format elf64-x86-
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:13:18 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358755: g++-4.0: G++ drops const int arrays
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
--- gcc-4.0-4.0.3/debian/rules2 2006-03-20 20:07:22.0 +0100
+++ gcc-4.0-4.0.3-1/debian/rules2 2006-03-23 22:55:10.0 +0100
@@ -233,6 +233,14 @@
endif
endif
+ifneq (,$(findstring softfloat,$(DEB_TARGET_GNU_CPU)
Hi, Falk,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> 3.5/3 A name having namespace scope (3.3.5) has internal linkage if it
> is the name of [...] an object or reference that is explicitly
> declared const and neither explicitly declared extern nor previously
> declared to have external linkage; [...]
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20060323-1
Severity: important
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20060323-1 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85
[...]
> /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20060323/build/gcc/gcj
> -B/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20060323/b
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-24 17:14 ---
*** Bug 26852 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-24 17:14 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26829 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350989 + unreproducible
Bug#350989: libtool on alpha causes linking errors when run on AFS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> tags 350989 + moreinfo
Bug#350989: libtool on alpha causes linking errors when run on AFS
Tags were: un
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:28:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#352529: [hppa] internal compiler error: in
reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391 (error: insn does not satisfy
its constraints)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked a
tags 342245 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
can you please test this with a current gcc like 4.0 or 4.1?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tags 350989 + unreproducible
tags 350989 + moreinfo
thanks
So. Does the same happen with newer versions like 4.0 or 4.1? And how
can it be reproduced?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 342245 + moreinfo
Bug#342245: gcc-3.4: boost 1.33.x FTBFS with "cannot handle
R_PARISC_PCREL17F..."
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.3-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi!
This seems to have only minor impact on the gcc build, but I happend to
chance upon this minor syntax error within the gcc build system and it
probably should be corrected:
[...]
echo | ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/i486-linux-gnu/bin/ -isy
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:55:24 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#327301: ICE on duplicate definitions of an inline function
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:45:38 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#309210: miscompilation of PARI/GP on x86
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 322723 + moreinfo
Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: moreinfo
> tags 322723 + unreproducible
Bug#322723: 'ip route' kernel problem w/ gcc-4.0
Tags were: moreinfo d-i
Tags added: unreproducible
> thanks
Sto
tags 322723 + moreinfo
tags 322723 + unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
is this still reproducible with current 4.0 or 4.1? If so, how?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 344503 icon
Bug#344503: Icon build failure on arm due to gcc-4.0 regression
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.0' to `icon'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
tags 350778 + unreproducible
tags 350778 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I cannot reproduce this. Can you still? Seems more likely to be some
kind of corruption of your system.
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 350778 + unreproducible
Bug#350778: gcc-4.0: corrupted error messages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> tags 350778 + moreinfo
Bug#350778: gcc-4.0: corrupted error messages
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
> thank
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # decided upstream against being fixed for 4.0.x series.
> tags 319309 + wontfix
Bug#319309: [fixed in 4.1, PR 22595] wrong warning: control may reach end of
non-void function
Tags were: fixed-upstream upstream
Tags added: wontfix
>
End of message, st
Package: gcj-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.5-13
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I try to compile a java file I obtain the message of the subject and can't
compile.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-386
Locale: [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358911 normal
Bug#358911: gcj: libgcj.spec: File not found
Severity set to `normal'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Your message dated Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:10:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#358911: gcj: libgcj.spec: File not found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
29 matches
Mail list logo
