Matthias Klose wrote:
> Bdale Garbee writes:
> > On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 01:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> > > The only change planned is to make libc6-dev-i386 and libc6-i386 provide
> > > a glibc on amd64 instead of ia32-libs. It will be in /emul/ia32-linux (I
> > > still have to find how
Andreas Jochens a écrit :
Matthias Klose wrote:
Bdale Garbee writes:
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 01:12 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
The only change planned is to make libc6-dev-i386 and libc6-i386 provide
a glibc on amd64 instead of ia32-libs. It will be in /emul/ia32-linux (I
still have to fin
On 06-Feb-24 12:06, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Andreas Jochens a écrit :
> >I suggest the following setup for 32-bit libraries on amd64:
> >
> >1. The ia32-libs package continues to install the 32-bit libraries in
> >/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib but it stops to provide the 32-bit libc6(-dev)
> >packages
Andreas Jochens a écrit :
On 06-Feb-24 12:06, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Andreas Jochens a écrit :
I suggest the following setup for 32-bit libraries on amd64:
1. The ia32-libs package continues to install the 32-bit libraries in
/emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib but it stops to provide the 32-bit libc6(
Hello,
On 06-Feb-24 14:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Andreas Jochens a écrit :
> When I say linking, I don't speak about the dynamic linking, but the
> linking that occurs when building a package with gcc.
>
> >because /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib is added to /etc/ld.so.conf by
> >ia32-libs.postinst.
tag 350688 patch
thanks
The attached patch integrates Daniel's patch into the build system.
It fixes the problem on PowerPC.
--
Matt
diff -Nru gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-orig/debian/patches/p-make-lang.dpatch
gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15/debian/patches/p-make-lang.dpatch
--- gcc-2.95-2.95.4.ds15-orig/debian/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 350688 patch
Bug#350688: gcc-2.95: FTBFS with new make
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:45:16AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > After a discussion on IRC, it seems there is no consensus about how
> > multiarch should be done. Therefore I stop working on that (patches are
> > still welcome for glibc).
> Is this really the best thing to do?
> Even tho
(restricting the CC list to real lists)
Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 07:45:16AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> > > After a discussion on IRC, it seems there is no consensus about how
> > > multiarch should be done. Therefore I stop working on that (p
9 matches
Mail list logo
