gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
libgcc2_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
protoize_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
libmudflap0_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
libmudflap0-dev_4.
(new) cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb standard interpreters
WARNING: Already present in main distribution.
The GNU C preprocessor
A macro processor that is used automatically by the GNU C compiler
to transform programs before actual compilation.
.
This package has been separated from gcc for the ben
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 10:25:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#319824: gcc: manpage typo: "\-"
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
gcc-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.changes isn't signed with PGP/GnuPG
Removing gcc-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.changes, but keeping its associated files for now.
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
gcc-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-3.4-base_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
cpp-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
gobjc-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
g++-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
libstdc++6-dev_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
libstdc++6-pic_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
libstdc++6-dbg_3.4.5-1_m68k.
Accepted:
cpp-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/cpp-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
g++-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g++-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
g77-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/g77-3.4_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
gcc-3.4-base_3.4.5-1_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.4/gcc-3.4-
gcc-defaults_1.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.30.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.30.tar.gz
cpp_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
cpp-doc_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
gcc_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
gcc-doc_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
g++_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
gobjc_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
g77_3.4.5-
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324687: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#321092: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#48: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:32:12 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334081: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-45_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-45_i386.deb
cpp-doc_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
cpp_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
g++_4.0.2-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 12:57:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcj built on mips/mipsel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsib
Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 13:02:44 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No way to get source-version from binary package version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
gcc-4.1_4.1ds4-0exp4_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-4.1-base_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
libgcc1_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
lib64gcc1_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
protoize_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
libmudflap0_4.1-0exp
(new) cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb standard interpreters
The GNU C preprocessor
A macro processor that is used automatically by the GNU C compiler
to transform programs before actual compilation.
.
This package has been separated from gcc for the benefit of those who
require the preprocessor but
gcc-defaults_1.30_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cpp_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
cpp-doc_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
gcc_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
gcc-doc_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
g++_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
gobjc_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
g77_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb
g77-doc_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb
gfortran_4.
Accepted:
cpp-doc_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
cpp_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
g++_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_4.0.2-2_hppa.deb
g77-doc_3.4.5-1_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77-doc_3
Hi all,
I'm trying to help Haakan Ardo with the toolchain-source package
and I'm having trouble building a cross compiler. First I must
say that I'm not yet 100% done with integrating the 4.0.3 line
of gcc into the toolchain-source package and that is why I need
your help.
I can build binutils a
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|wrong-code |link-failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11350
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-09-04 18:24:35 |2005-12-11 21:42:44
date||
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-09-10 18:28:59 |2005-12-11 22:55:33
date||
tag 333922 + fixed-in-experimental
tag 341356 + fixed-in-experimental
tag 341710 + fixed-in-experimental
tag 342484 + fixed-in-experimental
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to an
upload to the experimental distribution. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED M
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-09-10 18:48:34 |2005-12-11 23:08:53
date||
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 333922 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#333922: gcc-4.0 - please provide gcc-source-4.0 package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 341356 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#341356: gcc-4.1: Please add Ada support for GNU/kFreeBSD
T
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
fastjar_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
g++-4.1_4.1-0exp4_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
fastjar_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
g++-4.1_4.1-0exp4_s390.deb
to pool/main/g
Accepted:
cpp-4.1-doc_4.1-0exp4_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1-doc_4.1-0exp4_all.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_i386.deb
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_powerpc.deb
fastjar_4.1-0exp4_i386.deb
to pool/ma
Accepted:
cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/cpp-4.1_4.1-0exp4_ia64.deb
fastjar_4.1-0exp4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fastjar_4.1-0exp4_ia64.deb
fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-4.1/fixincludes_4.1-0exp4_ia64.deb
g++-4.1_4.1-0exp4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:34:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.1 4.1ds4-0exp4 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:34:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.1 4.1ds4-0exp4 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:34:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.1 4.1ds4-0exp4 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:34:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.1 4.1ds4-0exp4 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:34:25 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in upload of gcc-4.1 4.1ds4-0exp4 to experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
On Sun, Dec 11, 2005 at 09:49:14PM +0100, Daniel Widenfalk wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to help Haakan Ardo with the toolchain-source package
> and I'm having trouble building a cross compiler. First I must
> say that I'm not yet 100% done with integrating the 4.0.3 line
> of gcc into the toolc
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:59:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (mipsel/unstable): configure built with out-of-date libtool.m4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:02:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [PR target/23602] [4.1 regression] 1081 test failures in
libjava, when configured for i486-linux
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 01:04:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gcc-4.1: FTBFS on amd64: Can't find libssp.*
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Dec 1 18:58:03 UTC 2005 (revision 107827)
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C executi
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Dec 1 18:58:03 UTC 2005 (revision 107827)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cc54003
FAIL: ce3810b
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2318
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
Package: gcc-4.0
Version: 4.0.2-2
I use kernel-image 2.6.12-1-686 and gcc-4.0 (4.0.2-2), but
inserting snd-usb-audio occurred same problem.
# gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 (Debian 4.0.2-2)
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditio
41 matches
Mail list logo
