Hi Nathanael,
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
And for pkg-java-maintainers:
* Why was kaffe deliberately broken on mips and mipsel?
It was never _deliberately_ broken on mips and mipsel. On mipsel jikes
went broken and as there is no gcj available we have no option to compile
kaffe there at the mome
Hi,
* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051007 04:42]:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > If
> > you think, that availability of compilers on some architectures
> > should be release criterium, please bring that up with the release
> > team first.
> That's not at all what I think.
>
> I think that
Andreas Barth wrote:
Actually, there is one criterion missing: Does this bug really hurt us
bad (enough)? And my current answer to this is no, but of course, you
might want to persuade me. :)
...
So, I think we can say that this bug is even forwarded to upstream, as
mips Inc is aware of it and
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> > If
> > you think, that availability of compilers on some architectures
> > should be release criterium, please bring that up with the release
> > team first.
> That's not at all what I think.
>
> I think that if there are known binutils bugs for
Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051007 04:42]:
> > Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > If
> > > you think, that availability of compilers on some architectures
> > > should be release criterium, please bring that up with the release
> > > team first.
> > That's not
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> >Actually, there is one criterion missing: Does this bug really hurt us
> >bad (enough)? And my current answer to this is no, but of course, you
> >might want to persuade me. :)
> ...
>
> >So, I think we can say that this bug is even forwarded to up
On Fri, Oct 07, 2005 at 05:16:28AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I begin to get the picture.
>
> Apparently the MIPS ABI is just plain broken. It contains some sort of
> impassable hard limit on relocation table size, breaking random packages at
> random times with no possible fix. Nobody c
>> Apparently the MIPS ABI is just plain broken. It contains some sort of
>> impassable hard limit on relocation table size, breaking random packages at
>> random times with no possible fix. Nobody can fix this without changing
>> the ABI.
>
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>That's wrong.
OK. Can someb
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >> Apparently the MIPS ABI is just plain broken. It contains some sort of
> >> impassable hard limit on relocation table size, breaking random packages
> >> at
> >> random times with no possible fix. Nobody can fix this without changing
> >> the ABI.
> >
>
> Thiemo
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>You are mistaken (since I'm also upstream)
Upstream for binutils? Yes, you're one of two MIPS maintainers, second after
Eric Christopher, and there are also nine global maintainers.
And apparently nobody has documented this bug in the documentation for ld, or
bfd, or binut
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 329836
Bug#329836: gcc-4.0: static functions which are called only indirectly are
considered "unused"
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROT
--- Comment #4 from janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2005-10-07 19:45 ---
The most recent break on mainline was by this patch from jakub:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2005-08/msg00974.html
The same patch was applied to the 4.0 branch, causing the failure in 4.0.2.
That patch from Jak
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 19:50 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Before that, the failure on mainline started sometime between 2003-07-16 and
> 2003-09-15. I can identify the patch if it would be useful to anyone.
Hmm, can you because in PR 15167, Neil
Package: gcc-snapshot
Version: 20050904-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gcc-snapshot_20050904-1 on debian01 by sbuild/s390 42
[...]
> /build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050904/build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
> -B/build/buildd/gcc-snap
LAST_UPDATED:
=== libstdc++-v3 check-abi Summary ===
# of added symbols: 91
# of missing symbols:0
# of incompatible symbols: 0
using:
/build/buildd/gcc-3.3-3.3.6/src/libstdc++-v3/config/abi/alpha-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt
Native configurati
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_byname.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_char.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS:
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes8264
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 97
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of ex
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.abi/ptrflags.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.eh/catchptr1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess e
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.abi/ptrflags.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.eh/catchptr1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.law/profile1.C Execution
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/empty6.C (test for warnings, line 6)
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec4.C Execution test
XPASS:
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.dg/other/packed1.C execution test
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes8188
# of unexpected
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes8194
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Sep 22 08:56:02 UTC 2005
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/abi/bitfield4.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/eh/registers1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.
LAST_UPDATED:
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes8213
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 97
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
=== libffi Summary ===
# of expected passes219
# of unsupported tests 2
=== libjava tests ==
LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from CVS: -rgcc_4_0_2_release
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target uni
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Sep 22 08:56:02 UTC 2005
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c (test for excess errors)
WARNING: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: libffi.cal
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: a85013b
FAIL: a87b59a
FAIL: a95074d
FAIL: ad7201a
FAIL: c37402a
FAIL: c37403a
FAIL: c38102d
FAIL: c38202a
FAIL: c39008a
FAIL: c39008b
FAIL: c39008c
FAIL: c41306a
FAIL: c41306b
FAIL: c41
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cxf3a01
FAIL: cxf3a02
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2318
# of unexpected failures2
Native configuration is i486-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c (test for excess errors)
WARNING: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: libffi.cal
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c36204d
FAIL: c9a009a
FAIL: c9a009c
FAIL: c9a009h
FAIL: c9a010a
FAIL: cb4009a
FAIL: cd5014e
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2313
# of unexpected failures
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: c954026
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2319
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Runnin
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2320
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g+
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 4 15:06:30 UTC 2005
Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libffi tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c (test for excess errors)
WARNING: libffi.call/closure_fn0.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: libffi.cal
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 4 15:06:30 UTC 2005
Native configuration is ia64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes10830
# of unexpected succes
LAST_UPDATED: Sat Oct 1 13:51:09 UTC 2005
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: ce3810b
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2319
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 4 15:06:30 UTC 2005
Native configuration is mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes11272
# of unexpected succ
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 4 15:06:30 UTC 2005
Native configuration is mips-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes11272
# of unexpected succes
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 4 12:08:01 UTC 2005
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/opt/inline4.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of ex
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Sep 4 15:06:30 UTC 2005
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes11373
# of expected failures 66
# of unsupported tests 85
/b
41 matches
Mail list logo
