Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 301140
Bug#301140: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: dpkg fails to manage this package : filenames
too long (on my box at least)
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
Important Information:
Since 1924 our Official Swiss Pharm. has been the most
trusted pharm. in the world, year after year.
Unlike others, we allow you to order at your discretion,
without any questions and with the Iron Clad Swiss Privacy
Act assuring your order will be secure, delivered and
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 278105 + patch
Bug#278105: gcc-defaults: Make a libgcj-dev defaults package
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
tags 278105 + patch
thanks
The attached patch implements the addtion of a new 'libgcj-dev' package
to gcc-defaults.
Please look at Bug#300353 as an example of the problems which occur
because a 'libgcj-dev' package is missing.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/gcc-defaults-1.19/debi
Package: libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1
Version: 2.91.66-4
Severity: important
I'm not sure if filing a bug report is the right way to go handle this...
This library is needed by Sun's JDK 1.3.1, but the package does not
exist in the testing or unstable distributions. Can it be added?
-- System Informa
gcc-defaults_1.20_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
gcc-defaults_1.20.dsc
gcc-defaults_1.20.tar.gz
cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
gcc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
gcc-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
g++_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
gobjc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
g77_3.3.5-
thanks!
Andreas Jochens writes:
> * debian/control.m4
> - Add libc6-dev-powerpc [ppc64] to the Build-Depends.
> - Change the Description for lib32gcc1: s/ia32/32 bit Version/
> - Change the Depends for lib32gcc1 from 'ia32-libs' to '${shlibs:Depends}'.
> - Remove "Replaces: ia32-libs.openo
sorry, don't know anything about the status on the Hurd, CCing
debian-hurd.
Michael Banck writes:
> Package: gcc-3.4
> Severity: important
>
> Hello,
>
> Your package failed to build on hurd-i386:
>
> > Automatic build of gcc-3.4_3.4.3-12 on beethoven by sbuild/hurd-i386 1.170.5
> > Build start
chill_2.95.4-35_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-35_i386.deb
cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
g++_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.3.5-2_i386
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:10:42 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#301159: g++-3.4: gcc/g++ should use an alternative to
select the version to use
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 212260 + fixed-upstream
Bug#212260: [PR 13518] "virtual functions but non-virtual destructor" warning
incomplete
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: fixed-upstream
> retitle 212260 [fixed in 4.0] [PR 13518] "virtual functions but non-virtual
> destr
On 05-Mar-25 21:07, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > - Add libc6-dev-powerpc [ppc64] to the Build-Depends.
> > - Change the Description for lib32gcc1: s/ia32/32 bit Version/
> > - Change the Depends for lib32gcc1 from 'ia32-libs' to
> > '${shlibs:Depends}'.
> > - Remove "Replaces: ia32-libs.openo
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:22:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300453: gcj-4.0: internal compiler error if constructor
name is wrong
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:21:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300583: /usr/bin/gij-wrapper-3.0: Running
/etc/alternatives/java with no arguments segfaults.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:33:01 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#278105: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.20
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-35_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-35_i386.deb
cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp-doc_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
g++_3.3.5-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
March 23, 2005. Associates News
Flozar Heart Health News:
Breakthrough Natural Cholesterol Reduction System:
60% of people are at risk. are YOU?
No Dangerous side effects such as dizziness, nausea, yellow skin & more.
http://healthwatch.anationpickle.com/2fl2/
Try Flo
> The "File name too long" is an error returned by the rename() call,
> specifically ENAMETOOLONG.
>
> This filename is too long for your filesystem. I don't think dpkg
> should randomly truncate or alter filenames, therefore there's nothing
> dpkg can do here other than abort the installation.
18 matches
Mail list logo