Re: Old photos

2005-01-22 Thread techsupport
This address is invalid - please see the website for the correct address (sorry we have to bouce this due to excessive junk mail ) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#291605: marked as done (gcc-4.0: GCC4 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault)

2005-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 14:20:59 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#291605: gcc-4.0: GCC4 internal compiler error: Segmentation fault has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Processed: Re: Bug#291641: libtool: resolves dependencies to the install tree rather than the build tree

2005-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 291641 gcc-3.3 Bug#291641: libtool: resolves dependencies to the install tree rather than the build tree Bug reassigned from package `libtool' to `gcc-3.3'. > retitle 291641 Checks dependencies of shared libraries without honouring RPATH Bug#

Bug#291693: gcc-3.3: optimization -O2 is worst than -O1

2005-01-22 Thread Bozhan Boiadzhiev
Package: gcc-3.3 Version: 1:3.3.5-5 Severity: normal I found this page http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/gccintro/gccintro_43.html and i diceide to try it becouse i was curios of optimizations. And the results are little strange. I have two more configuration on woody and one redhat9 w

Bug#291693: marked as done (gcc-3.3: optimization -O2 is worst than -O1)

2005-01-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:51:43 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#291693: gcc-3.3: optimization -O2 is worst than -O1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#291641: libtool: resolves dependencies to the install tree rather than the build tree

2005-01-22 Thread Philip Martin
Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 01:01 +, Philip Martin wrote: > >> A recent change to the Subversion source (revision 12801) introduced >> new functions into the three dependent libraries, and made >> libsvn_ra-1.so reference those new functions. >> > D

Bug#291762: gcj-3.4 should depend on libgcj5-dev

2005-01-22 Thread wasabi
Package: gcj-3.4 Severity: normal Subject says it all. I installed gcj-3.4 and it gave an error until I installed libgcj5-dev. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#291762: gcj-3.4 should depend on libgcj5-dev

2005-01-22 Thread Matthias Klose
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Package: gcj-3.4 > Severity: normal > > Subject says it all. I installed gcj-3.4 and it gave an error until I > installed libgcj5-dev. yes, you don't need it for compiling to byte code. It's a recommendation only. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with