(damn, this mailer sucks, sorry for any mangling)
Bryce Wilcox-O'Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I use Crypto++ v5.0 [1], and I've noticed that the "generate a random
> RSA key pair" function either seg faults or goes into an infinite
> loop. I've learned that turning optimization off with -O0 or el
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.2-4
Severity: normal
While compiling the kernel on a sparc system I get the following errors in
kernel-source-2.4.22/arch/sparc/kernel/check_asm.c:
gcc -o check_asm check_asm.c
check_asm.c:309: error: field name not in record or union initializer
check_asm.c:309: e
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> The offending line is
> .section".note.GNU-stack"
> at the end of the initialization of unsigned int check_asm_data[].
This is not valid sytax. It ought to be
.section = ".note.GNU-stack"
Please reassign to the source package.
> Actually, it works just like it is supposed to work. That may not be the
> same as in the past, but it's the way it should be. Granted the surprise
> is something the users will have to adjust to, but that doesn't mean
> things shouldn't work properly.
>
> On a 64-bit machine, one should expect
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:04:52AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Actually, it works just like it is supposed to work. That may not be the
> > same as in the past, but it's the way it should be. Granted the surprise
> > is something the users will have to adjust to, but that doesn't mean
> > things
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-19
16:12 ---
*** Bug 13123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Package: gcj-3.3
Version: 3.3.2-4
Severity: normal
Greetings,
gcj-3.3 ICEs during at attempted build of babel 0.8.8. The compile
command is quite ugly:
javac -g -d . -classpath
../lib/java-getopt-1.0.7.jar:../lib/xerces-2.4.0.jar:../lib/jcert-1.0.1.jar:../lib/jnet-1.0.1.jar:../lib/external/jsse
Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> gcj-3.3 ICEs during at attempted build of babel 0.8.8. The compile
> command is quite ugly:
>
> javac -g -d . -classpath
> ../lib/java-getopt-1.0.7.jar:../lib/xerces-2.4.0.jar:../lib/jcert-1.0.1.jar:../lib/jnet-1.0.1.jar:../lib/external/jsse-1.0.1.j
On Wed, 2003-11-19 at 16:13, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > gcj-3.3 ICEs during at attempted build of babel 0.8.8. The compile
> > command is quite ugly:
> >
> > javac -g -d . -classpath
> > ../lib/java-getopt-1.0.7.jar:../lib/xerces-2.4.0.jar:../lib/jc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 221621 kernel-source-2.4.22
Bug#221621: gcc-3.3: fails to compile the linux kernel
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `kernel-source-2.4.22'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
I am interested in excelsior living room tables,
sofa tables, etc, and bedroon furniture. Is there a cheaper way to buy
these products other than in a retail store?
Sincerely
Debra Noel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reassign 221621 kernel-image-sparc-2.4
quit
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:48:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > reassign 221621 kernel-source-2.4.22
> Bug#221621: gcc-3.3: fails to compile the linux kernel
> Bug reassigned from package `g
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:13:33AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> reassign 221621 kernel-image-sparc-2.4
> quit
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 03:48:12PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > reassign 221621 kernel-source-2.4.22
> > Bug#221621:
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:17:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> But this is a bug in the kernel source, not in the sparc kernel package.
> Why should it be assigned to the kernel-image-sparc package when it has
> to be fixed in the kernel-source package?
The kernel-source package does not support
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 09:30:11AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 05:17:16PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > But this is a bug in the kernel source, not in the sparc kernel package.
> > Why should it be assigned to the kernel-image-sparc package when it has
> > to be fixed in
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:14:30PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> Just because the binaries are built somewhere else does not defer the
> fact that the bug is in the source. He's having a problem building the
> kernel-source package, and that has to be fixed there, not in
> kernel-image-sparc. Even
--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2003-11-19 23:28
---
The same ICE has also been reported for another program in the Debian bug
tracking system. See http://bugs.debian.org/221738
--
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 10:25:21AM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 06:14:30PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Just because the binaries are built somewhere else does not defer the
> > fact that the bug is in the source. He's having a problem building the
> > kernel-source pack
reassign 221621 kernel
quit
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 07:23:04PM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > OK. I'm happy to do this as long as you don't mind any patch
> > conflicts as a result this should your architecture require
> > patches later on.
> >
> > If you agree with that, please reassign the bu
20 matches
Mail list logo
