Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
tags 214694 + unreproducible thanks unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h? xiphmont writes: > Package: gcc-3.3 > Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre5 > Severity: grave > Tags: sid > Justification: renders package unusable > > I apologize for originally filing this against libc6-dev; I see >

Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread xiphmont
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > tags 214694 + unreproducible > thanks > > unable to reproduce. what is the contents of confdefs.h? I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what trigger

Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread Phil Edwards
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:29:03AM -0400, xiphmont wrote: > I have more information to offer; it appears to be a version skew > problem. Updating only gcc-3.3 and not g++-3.3 is what triggered the > problem (g++ was expecting includes in the old location, gcc had > removed/moved them). I'd have t

Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread xiphmont
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:50:38AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > reassign 214692 g++-3.3 > reassign 214694 g++-3.3 > severity 214692 normal > severity 214694 normal > merge 214692 214694 > retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (>= 3.3.2) > thanks ...is there any way to cause

Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 214692 g++-3.3 reassign 214694 g++-3.3 severity 214692 normal severity 214694 normal merge 214692 214694 retitle 214694 g++-3.3 (3.3.2) should depend on gcc-3.3 (>= 3.3.2) thanks xiphmont writes: > > > > On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 07:09:19AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > tags 214694 +

Bug#214692: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
xiphmont writes: > ...is there any way to cause a gcc 3.3.2 upgrade to force a g++ 3.3.2 > upgrade as well (but only if g++ 3.3 is installed) as that is what > actually bit me? (ie, upgrading gcc did not upgrade g++, and thus g++ broke) g++-3.3 depends on gcc-3.3 (>= 1:3.3.2), so apt-get should al

Processed: Re: Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged compiler includes

2003-10-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 214692 g++-3.3 Bug#214692: libc6-dev: stdlib.h internal #includes broken/point to moved/non-existent headers Bug reassigned from package `libc6-dev' to `g++-3.3'. > reassign 214694 g++-3.3 Bug#214694: Newest gcc-3.3 can't find any packaged co

[Bug fortran/11522] [3.3/3.4 Regression] g77 dwarf-2 ICE in add_abstract_origin_attribute

2003-10-08 Thread arobb at mva dot co dot uk
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11522 --- Additional Comments From arobb at mva dot co dot uk 2003-10-08 08:20 --- I do not understand what this has to do with STRING(K:K) not being recognized as a single cha

Bug#214694: gcc-3.3 should conflict with g++-3.3 (<< 3.3.2)

2003-10-08 Thread Blars Blarson
Unless I'm totally misreading the bug, the problem is gcc needs to conflict with g++ versions that are incompatable with it. Shouldn't this be reopened and reassigned to gcc? -- Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.blars.org/blars.html With

[Bug fortran/11522] [3.3/3.4 Regression] g77 dwarf-2 ICE in add_abstract_origin_attribute

2003-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11522 --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-08 15:12 --- Just a note that the bug which had been marked as dup of this one which dealt with STRING

Results for 3.3.2 20031005 (Debian prerelease) testsuite on arm-unknown-linux-gnu

2003-10-08 Thread Matthias Klose
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Oct 5 17:32:22 UTC 2003 Native configuration is arm-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix FAIL: calls run FAIL: cxxtest run FAIL: field run FAIL: final_method run FAIL: findclass run FAIL: invoke run FAIL: martin run FAIL: noclass run FAI

[Bug ada/10110] [3.3/3.4 regression] [mipsel-linux]ada bootstrap error

2003-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10110 --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-09 01:41 --- Does this still happen with lastest compilers? --- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug target/12371] [3.4 regression] [m68k-linux] bootstrap error in make compare

2003-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target

[Bug target/12527] [3.4 regression] [arm] bootstrap error on arm-linux

2003-10-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12527 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target