Bug#211661: gcc-3.3: With -std=c99, the NAN and INFINITY macros are not regarded as constants

2003-10-01 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Hi, It seems that your message didn't arrive at (or wasn-t accepted by) the BTS, as seen on . Perhaps because glibc isn't a package (only a source package). It should have been libc6-dev perhaps? On 2003-09-30 00:00:47 +0200, Matthias Klose

[Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm

2003-10-01 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm

2003-10-01 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 --- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-01 09:18 --- Note for clarity. By "four bytes per statement" I mean between each semicolon in the inp

[Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm

2003-10-01 Thread falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 --- Additional Comments From falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2003-10-01 09:29 --- Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm "rea

[Bug target/11442] [3.3 regression] [arm] invalid assembler on arm

2003-10-01 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11442 --- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-01 10:16 --- > Is this something ARM specific? I can't find anything in the manual > about it. If it's

Bug#211909: RAV AntiVirus scan results

2003-10-01 Thread RAV
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.2 (snapshot-20020108) Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. 23 more days to evaluate. Running on host: home.becks.com.br --- RAV Antivirus results --- The infected file was saved

Bug#211909: RAV AntiVirus scan results

2003-10-01 Thread RAV
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.2 (snapshot-20020108) Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. 23 more days to evaluate. Running on host: home.becks.com.br --- RAV Antivirus results --- The infected file was saved

Bug#210848: RAV AntiVirus scan results

2003-10-01 Thread RAV
RAV AntiVirus for Linux i686 version: 8.3.2 (snapshot-20020108) Copyright (c) 1996-2001 GeCAD The Software Company. All rights reserved. 23 more days to evaluate. Running on host: home.becks.com.br --- RAV Antivirus results --- The infected file was saved

[Bug target/11793] [3.3.1 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175

2003-10-01 Thread segher at koffie dot nl
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11793 segher at koffie dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added

Bug#213618: gcc-3.3-doc: "info gcc" brings up internals docs, not user docs

2003-10-01 Thread Andrew Pimlott
Package: gcc-3.3-doc Version: 1:3.3.2-0pre4 Severity: minor It's intuitive for "info gcc" to document use of the compiler, but the stand-along info reader finds gccint-3.3 in preference to gcc-3.3. I don't know what the rules are for finding info files, but it would be nice to arrange for gcc-3.

Bug#211661: gcc-3.3: With -std=c99, the NAN and INFINITY macros are not regarded as constants

2003-10-01 Thread Vincent Lefevre
reassign libc6-dev thanks On 2003-10-01 09:28:12 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Perhaps, but the definition of NAN in /usr/include/bits/nan.h > uses a gcc extension: > > # define NAN \ > (__extension__\ >((union { unsigned __l __a

Processed: [vincent@vinc17.org: Re: Bug#211661: gcc-3.3: With -std=c99, the NAN and INFINITY macros are not regarded as constants]

2003-10-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 211661 libc6-dev Bug#211661: gcc-3.3: With -std=c99, the NAN and INFINITY macros are not regarded as constants Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.3' to `libc6-dev'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance.

[Bug fortran/12449] [3.3 regression] ICE in add_abstract_origin_attribute

2003-10-01 Thread toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12449 toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/11717] [3.3 regression] [alpha] unrecognizable insn compiling for.c of kernel 2.4.22-pre8

2003-10-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11717 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added