The package installed fine for me as well, and I agree that this looks like
a problem with the submitter's system and not with gcc-3.3.
--
- mdz
At 08 Aug 2003 13:40:42 +0100,
Philip Blundell wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 13:35, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > So how to act for two bugs?:
> >
> > #203322: python2.2: Python fails with illegal instruction during
> > postinst on sparc32
> > #203324: libc6: __strtod_internal fails with ille
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Begin Message ---
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2003-08-08 06:36
---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
"do
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-08-09
08:05 ---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
rsandifo at redhat d
reassign 200619 dietlibc
retitle 200619 dietlibc: parisc: bad stat struct mapping
thanks
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:21:26PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote:
> > At the fstat call we have the following values:
> >
> > Breakpoint 11, 0x00010b10 in __stdio_init_file_nothreads ()
>
> Carlos O'Donell
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 200619 dietlibc
Bug#200619: gcc: parisc: compiling dietlibc-dev with -Os causes segfault
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `dietlibc'.
> retitle 200619 dietlibc: parisc: bad stat struct mapping
Bug#200619: gcc: parisc: compiling dietlibc-de
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2003-08-09 09:23
---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
"doko at cs dot tu-berlin
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From agx at sigxcpu dot org 2003-08-09 11:04
---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 09:23
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
agx at sigxcpu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Nathanael Nerode writes:
> Matthias Klose wrote:
> >so make -mcpu=i586 -mtune=i686 the default? anything else as the
> >default?
>
> Just to clarify, that would be the default for *hurd* only, right?
yes
> There's no good reason to drop 486 support under Linux. So for Linux,
> it would be -mcp
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.1-0pre0
Severity: wishlist
The program
--
#include
void foo(struct timespec *t, struct timespec *u)
{
struct timespec zero = {0, 0};
*t = zero;
*u = zero;
}
--
produces the following code on i386 with -Os
--
.file "b.c"
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11716
--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at redhat dot com 2003-08-09 11:44
---
Subject: Re: [mips] branch out of range when building fold-const.c
"agx at sigxcpu dot org"
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 152501 gcj-3.3
Bug#152501: [PR java/7304] gcj-3.1 ICE
Bug reassigned from package `gcj-3.2' to `gcj-3.3'.
> reassign 165635 gcj-3.3
Bug#165635: [PR java/8608] segmentation fault on compiling bad program
Bug reassigned from package `gcj-3.2' to
[ Please CC: me in the replies since I'm not subscribed to this list ]
Hello,
The code below is compiled fine by g++-2.95 while g++-3.3 (version 3.3.1-1)
fails with the following message:
/home/goedson/teste.cc: In function `int main(int, char**)':
/home/goedson/teste.cc:22: error: conversion f
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10350
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9069
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10350
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9363
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
19 matches
Mail list logo
