>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Nicolas Burrus
>Organization: LRDE
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: static_cast behavior with subclasses when default constructor
>available
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: c++
>Class: rejects-legal
>Release: 3.3.
Package: cpp
Severity: serious
The manpages fsf-funding(7), gpl(7), and gfdl(7) are included in the
cpp package. These are clearly non-free (non-modifiable). [Plus they
aren't mentioned in the copyright file, which claims the package is
GPLed]
They should almost certainly be removed entirely, and
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-7
Description:
g++/gcc (Version: 1:3.0.4-7, 2:2.95.4-14 and possibly others) crashes
with segmentation-fault when compiling this:
===bang.cc===
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
std::complex a(1.0, 1.0);
std::complex b(1.0, 1.0);
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-07-04
11:38 ---
Might be related to PR 11198.
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
Yo
On Friday 04 July 2003 13:29, Michael Weitzel wrote:
> Description:
> g++/gcc (Version: 1:3.0.4-7, 2:2.95.4-14 and possibly others) crashes
> with segmentation-fault when compiling this:
Still applies to 3:3.3-1
-- vbi
--
One good turn usually gets most of the blanket.
pgpKptSM0On7o.pgp
Descr
Hi,
I can confirm this. It's still there in gcc 3.4 20030629. Test case:
void f (int a)
{
__imag__ a;
}
--
Falk
Whoops, compiled the wrong file. Test case:
void f (void)
{
struct { } a;
__imag__ a;
}
Only occurs with g++, not gcc.
--
Falk
> > > The fontconfig segfault happens with any of the 2.1.92-2, 2.2.0-2 or
> > > 2.2.0-5 versions of fontconfig/libfontconfig on kullervo.
> >
> > Ok, that would at first glance appear to void my hypothesis; however,
> > fontconfig uses freetype, and that could have been miscompiled. Can you
>
> I
Andrew Suffield writes:
> Package: cpp
> Severity: serious
>
> The manpages fsf-funding(7), gpl(7), and gfdl(7) are included in the
> cpp package. These are clearly non-free (non-modifiable).
this doesn't make sense. you are not allowed to change a copyright,
even for software distributed in main
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9812
--- Additional Comments From doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de 2003-07-04
20:30 ---
Subject: Re: Bug#177840: [3.3/3.4 regression] [m68k] ICE in extract_insn, at
recog.c:214
wilson at tuliptree dot org writes:
> The resulting patch works for this testcase. I suspect we will get
> better PIC FP code also, since we aren't needlessly forcing non-XFmode
> constants into memory. This gives a medium size patch that will need a
> lot of testing, and may not be appropriate f
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> AFAIK the distribution of
> license texts is allowed in main, even if the license itself is
> non-free.
This would seem to be only common sense.
If I take it upon myself to educate the world about the evil and stupidity
of the EULA
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 10:18:50PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Andrew Suffield writes:
> > Package: cpp
> > Severity: serious
> > The manpages fsf-funding(7), gpl(7), and gfdl(7) are included in the
> > cpp package. These are clearly non-free (non-modifiable).
> this doesn't make sense. you ar
Your message dated Fri, 4 Jul 2003 22:33:01 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#199361: cpp-3.3: cpp0 not installed in
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/*/3.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # submitted Debian report #200011 to gcc-gnats as PR 11437
> # http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11437
> forwarded 200011 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11437
Bug#200011: g++/g++-3.0 segfaults when mixing __complex__-syntax and
std::complex by mistake
Noted your statement th
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11437
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-07-04 21:54
---
I forgot to say: I don't know whether the code is legal, but
it shouldn't ICE anyway, in parti
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11350
pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attach
18 matches
Mail list logo
