Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
>
> Are you volunteering?
Ryan Murray provided a patch, which I attach here. Needed for the 3.3
branch as well. checked on mips
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:57:08AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> > On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
> > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
> >
> > Are you volunteering?
>
> Ryan Murray provide
Miah Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As such, I've come here in the hope that someone can suggest how I might
> find out the exact cause of the problem, as I've never had to try and track
> down potential compiler bugs before.
Dear Miah,
As a starting point, you have to find precisely out
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Sep 24 07:36:40 UTC 2002
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec4.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.robertl/eb83.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Dec 31 12:49:32 UTC 2002
Native configuration is m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.eh/spec3.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec4.C Execution test
WARNING: program timed out.
FAIL: g++.law/virtual3.C (test for excess errors)
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
g++-3.2_3.2.2-0pre6_i386.deb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and th
Accepted:
cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre6_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2-doc_3.2.2-0pre6_all.deb
cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/cpp-3.2_3.2.2-0pre6_i386.deb
fastjar_3.2.2-0pre6_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-3.2/fastjar_3.2.2-0pre6_i386.deb
fixincludes_3.2.2-0pre6_i386.deb
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2003 06:17:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177674: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds5-0pre6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2003 06:17:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#176311: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds5-0pre6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 24 Jan 2003 06:17:43 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177679: fixed in gcc-3.2 1:3.2.2ds5-0pre6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
At 08:57 24.01.2003, Matthias Klose wrote:
Benjamin Kosnik writes:
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:25:04 +0100
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is it likely this will be addressed in the gcc-3.2 branch?
>
> Are you volunteering?
Ryan Murray provided a patch, which I attach here. Needed for
>Note that this will render the other libtool using subdirectories as
>broken until someone fixes up the automake/autoconf in that directory.
>
>Specifically, libjava, libffi, and boehm-gc will need to have Makefile.am
>updated to work with the version of automake in use (1.4), and then those
>dir
On Jan 24, 2003, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch touches a few Makefile.am's to remove the
> --tag option to libtool (doesn't exist),
It does exist in the libtool.m4 that's in the top level of the
hierarchy, and that's what you're supposed to use. Not using it, and
removing
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 05:27:45PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote:
> >Ryan Murray provided a patch, which I attach here. Needed for the 3.3
> >branch as well. checked on mips{,el}-linux and i386-linux only.
> >
> >The patch touches a few Makefile.am's to remove the
> >--tag option to libtool (doesn't exis
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:06:31AM -0600, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> >Specifically, libjava, libffi, and boehm-gc will need to have Makefile.am
> >updated to work with the version of automake in use (1.4), and then those
> >directories will also have to be autoreconf'd
>
> I think you'll get more tr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ryan Murray) writes:
|> The branch of libtool that supports --tag has been totally untouched
|> in cvs for at least two years.
The multi-language-branch is dead, and has been merged into HEAD nearly
two years ago.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:08:36PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ryan Murray) writes:
>
> |> The branch of libtool that supports --tag has been totally untouched
> |> in cvs for at least two years.
>
> The multi-language-branch is dead, and has been merged into HEAD nearly
> t
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 11:34:34AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > which binutils are used? Some older versions had bugs that were
> > only triggered by gcc-3.2
>
> At least I tested with binutils 2.13.90.0.16-1.
> But, I don't know the version number of the buildd environment.
seems to be the
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 10:23:01PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> > At least I tested with binutils 2.13.90.0.16-1.
> > But, I don't know the version number of the buildd environment.
> seems to be the version used during the build as well. Haven't
> tested this version but the problems I menti
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre6
Severity: minor
info gcc gives me the gccint-3.2.info file, but it would be more
logical to present gcc-3.2.info. man gcc works as expected.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux endquote 2.5.53 #2 Mon Dec 30 16:36:48
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 177674
Bug#177674: Outdated config.sub/config.guess
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> retitle 177674 Missing Build-Depends on autotools-dev
Bug#177674: Outdated config.sub/config.guess
Changed Bug title.
> severity 177674 minor
Bug#177674
reopen 177674
retitle 177674 Missing Build-Depends on autotools-dev
severity 177674 minor
Packages which directly access the scripts from autotools-dev (such as
the cp -p command placed into GCC in the last version) need to declare a
Build-Depend on the autotools-dev package.
Thank you for making
22 matches
Mail list logo
