On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 11:44 AM, Falk Hueffner wrote:
The declaration
int x[2, 3];
is not legal in C99, since "2, 3" is not an assignment-expression.
I'm not a C99 language lawyer, but are you sure? Is the comma operator
allowed there, or would one have to write "int x[(2,3)]" to get th
Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The declaration
> >
> > int x[2, 3];
> >
> > is not legal in C99, since "2, 3" is not an assignment-expression.
>
> I'm not a C99 language lawyer, but are you sure? Is the comma operator
> allowed there, or would one have to write "int x[(2,3)]"
Le jeu 16/01/2003 à 22:39, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette writes:
> > Package: gcc-3.2
> > Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
> > Severity: important
> >
> > It seems that the m68k buildd encountered a GCC bug while building HDF5
> > with gcc-3.2 :
> > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=hdf5
[...]
dpkg-deb: building package `zsh' in `../zsh_4.0.6-19_m68k.deb'.
test -f debian/rules
mkdir obj-static
cd obj-static && CFLAGS='-Wall -g -O2' ../configure --prefix=/usr
--bindir=/bin --mandir=/usr/share/man
+--infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-maildir-support
--enable-max-jobtable-size=256 --en
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 19 09:21:51 UTC 2003
Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bi
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 19 09:21:51 UTC 2003
Native configuration is powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 19 09:21:51 UTC 2003
Native configuration is s390-ibm-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfiel
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 19 09:21:51 UTC 2003
Native configuration is alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
=== libjava tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: PR1343 compilation from bytecode
FAIL: PR1343 -O compilation from bytecode
FAIL: initexc execution - gij test
FAIL: initexc execution - gij
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 19 09:21:51 UTC 2003
Native configuration is i386-pc-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5)
FAIL: g++.dg/tls/init-2.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.other/init5.C Execution test
LAST_UPDATED: Sun Jan 19 09:21:51 UTC 2003
Native configuration is hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 y_tst.o compile
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bitfield7 x_tst.o-y_tst.o link
UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/compat/break/bit
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: 3.2.2ds4
Severity: wishlist
The config.{sub,guess} scripts in the source tarball are not up to date,
and as such, do not correctly handle the recently added config triplet for
Debian NetBSD/i386 systems (i386-unknown-netbsdelf-gnu). These scripts
occur in the root source
11 matches
Mail list logo