For correct libstdc++ testresults, the presence for the following
locales is needed:
de_DE ISO-8859-1
en_US ISO-8859-1
fr_FR ISO-8859-1
How can I make sure, that these locales are installed when building
gcc-3.2, gcc-3.3 and gcc-snapshot packages? (Yes, I can check for
these in the rules an
Brian Nelson writes:
> Package: gcc-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please post the status of the GCC 3.x transition here, so people aren't
> in the dark and don't have to constantly ask about it on IRC,
> debian-devel, etc.
you find the draft of the transition plan on
I did not test for this patch explicitely ...
2003-01-03 Jeff Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include/ffi.h.in: Add closure defines for SPARC, SPARC64.
* src/ffitest.c (main): Use static storage for closure.
* src/sparc/ffi.c (ffi_prep_closure, ffi_closure_sparc_inner): New.
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Matthias Klose wrote:
> 2003-01-03 Jeff Sturm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * include/ffi.h.in: Add closure defines for SPARC, SPARC64.
> * src/ffitest.c (main): Use static storage for closure.
> * src/sparc/ffi.c (ffi_prep_closure, ffi_closure_sparc_inner):
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
>
> Package: g77-3.2
> Version: +N/A; reported 2003-01-05
> Severity: important
>
> This applies to g77-3.2 on m68k as detailed below in an email I first sent
> to the m68k build crew, and John Eaton, Octave's author.
>
> Let me know if you need more help. John does pro
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> >
> > Package: g77-3.2
> > Version: +N/A; reported 2003-01-05
> > Severity: important
> >
> > This applies to g77-3.2 on m68k as detailed below in an email I first sent
> > to the m68k build crew, and John Eaton, Octave's author.
> >
> > Let me know if you need mo
Synopsis: [3.3 branch regression] Ada bootstrap failure on mipsel-linux
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: echristo
State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 6 12:13:41 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Fixed. Mainline and branch.
2003-01-06 Eric Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: target
>Class: ice-on-legal-code
>Release: 3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 175478 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#175478: g77-3.2: Internal error encountered compiling octave 2.1
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 175478 [PR target/9201] [3.2 branch regression] ICE compiling
> oct
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `target/9201'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: target
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: [3.2 branch regression] ICE compiling octave-2.1 on m68k-linux
>Arriva
Whoops, forgot to Cc this to the bug report...
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Daniel Schepler writes:
> > Package: gcc-3.0
> > Version: 3.0.4ds3-13
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > When I try to build gcc-3.0 on unstable, first there are bison errors
> > in java-parse.y.
>
> please c
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-18_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-18_sparc.deb
cpp_3.2.2-0_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_sparc.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_sparc.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_sparc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.
Accepted:
cpp_3.2.2-0_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_hppa.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_hppa.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.2.2-0_hppa.deb
gcc_3.2.2-0_hppa.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_3.2.2-0_hppa.deb
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-18_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-18_arm.deb
cpp_3.2.2-0_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_arm.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_arm.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_arm.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.2.2-0_arm.deb
Accepted:
cpp_3.2.2-0_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_ia64.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_ia64.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.2.2-0_ia64.deb
gcc_3.2.2-0_ia64.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/gcc_3.2.2-0_ia64.deb
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-18_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-18_alpha.deb
cpp_3.2.2-0_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_alpha.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_alpha.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_alpha.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-18_s390.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-18_s390.deb
cpp_3.2.2-0_s390.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_s390.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_s390.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_s390.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_s390.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.2.2-0_s
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-18_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-18_m68k.deb
cpp_3.2.2-0_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_m68k.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_m68k.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_m68k.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.2.2-0_m
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-18_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-18_powerpc.deb
cpp_3.2.2-0_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_powerpc.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_powerpc.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-d
Accepted:
chill_2.95.4-18_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/chill_2.95.4-18_i386.deb
cpp_3.2.2-0_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/cpp_3.2.2-0_i386.deb
g++_3.2.2-0_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g++_3.2.2-0_i386.deb
g77_3.2.2-0_i386.deb
to pool/main/g/gcc-defaults/g77_3.2.2-0_i
Synopsis: race condition in libstdc++3 (basic_string.tcc)
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bkoz
State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 6 12:49:46 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Can example code that demonstrates this problem be provided please? I'd
like to add it to the thread testcase
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2003 16:02:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#162201: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2003 16:02:31 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#138038: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 06 Jan 2003 16:02:32 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#163294: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 84935 aptitude
Bug#84935: g++ fails to compile aptitude on the mips architecture
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `aptitude'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 156291 maxima
Bug#156291: gcc: ia64 gcc-3.1 cannot compile file with optimization
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `maxima'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 85230 ace
Bug#85230: template related ICE compiling ACE 5.1.8 library
Bug reassigned from package `g++' to `ace'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 163495 afbackup-client
Bug#163495: afbackup - undefined symbol: __muldi3
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `afbackup-client'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `c/9209'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: c
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: cc allows dollars in identifiers by default on i386 but fails
>Arrival-Date: M
Gudrun,
you submitted a bug report for the g77 package. On Fri, 27 Dec 2002
10:50:15 +0100 I asked for further information.
If you are using the Debian unstable distribution, please update your
installation and rebuild with g77 (>= 3:3.2).
Please provide the missing information or I'll close the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 121269 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#121269: gcc allows dollars in identifiers by default on i386 but fails
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> retitle 121269 [PR c/9209] cc allows dollars in identifiers by default
Synopsis: cc allows dollars in identifiers by default on i386 but fails
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 6 16:43:21 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed.
There are several things that are wrong:
- The warning has no effect,
32 matches
Mail list logo
