> >How-To-Repeat:
>
> /** Run "arm-linux-gcc -c" on this preprocessed segment : **/
>
>
> unsigned int x0 = 0;
>
> typedef struct {
> unsigned int field1 : 20;
> unsigned int field2 : 12;
> } XX;
>
> static XX yy;
>
> static void foo (void)
> {
> yy.field1 = (unsigned int ) (&x0);
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:41:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> 64bit itself is not broken on Debian. The part that we have trouble with
> is very fine grained. Dpkg selects architecture based on gcc's target.
> For us, even on sparc64, that is "sparc-linux".
>
> However, if we want to enable 64bit
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:20:42AM -0500, Roy Bixler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 10:41:18PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > 64bit itself is not broken on Debian. The part that we have trouble with
> > is very fine grained. Dpkg selects architecture based on gcc's target.
> > For us, even on spar
Hi ..
I just want to deinstall gcc-3.0, because I'm using sid and gcc-3.2 for
OpenOffice.org ... but I got this,
shaun:~# apt-get --purge remove gcc-3.0-base libstdc++3 g++-3.0
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following packages will be REMOVED:
cpp-3.0* g++-3.0
Package: gcc-3.2-base
Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1
Severity: important
Tags: sid
The gcc-3.2-base package for Debian/sid/sparc disables 64-bit
(-m64) support. This is a rather serious omission, since it
means there is no way to build 64-bit binaries, including the
kernel.
This should be just a configu
Jan-Hendrik Palic writes:
> Why depends gcc-3.2-nof on gcc-3.0-base?
bug. fixed for the next upload.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 03:22:21AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Package: gcc-3.2-base
> Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid
>
> The gcc-3.2-base package for Debian/sid/sparc disables 64-bit
> (-m64) support. This is a rather serious omission, since it
> means there is no wa
Hi .
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:33:54PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>Jan-Hendrik Palic writes:
>> Why depends gcc-3.2-nof on gcc-3.0-base?
>
>bug. fixed for the next upload.
ah thnx for the answer ... :)
regards
Jan
--
.''`.Jan-Hendrik Palic |
: :'
8 matches
Mail list logo