Bug#159395: FTBFS with MAKEFLAGS="-j2"

Joel Baker writes: > Package: gcc-3.2 > Version: 1:3.2.1ds0-0pre1 > Severity: normal > > Trying to build GCC 3.2 (using GCC 3.0.4 experimental) on the NetBSD/i386 > port with MAKEFLAGS="-j2" set (the -d flag is used to cope with the fact FYI: - building Ada with -j is currenty not supported upst

Bug#159620: Patch for __cxa_atexit

cxa_atexit is on by default. Modified to: ifneq ($(with_cxa_atexit),yes) CONFARGS += --disable-__cxa_atexit endif Joel Baker writes: > tag 159620 +patch > > diff -urN debian.orig/rules.defs debian/rules.defs > --- debian.orig/rules.defs Wed Sep 4 16:39:06 2002 > +++ debian/rules.defs W

gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

>Submitter-Id: net >Originator:Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Organization: The Debian Project >Confidential: no >Synopsis: >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Category: c >Class: sw-bug >Release: 3.2.1 CVS (Debian) (Debian unstable) >Environm

Bug#159838: c/7853: gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `c/7853'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: c >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line >Arrival-Date: Sun S

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #159838 to gcc-gnats as PR c/7853

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 159838 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#159838: gcc-3.2: reports multiple symbol definitions on the wrong line Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 159838 [PR c/7853] gcc reports multiple symbol definitions on

Processed: forwarded gcc report

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 157416 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#157416: cpp-3.2: _Pragma within macros is improperly expanded Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 157416 [fixed in 3.3] cpp: _Pragma within macros is improperly > expan

Bug#116145: libgcj/7854: fastjar update (-u) should be implemented

Thank you very much for your problem report. It has the internal identification `libgcj/7854'. The individual assigned to look at your report is: unassigned. >Category: libgcj >Responsible:unassigned >Synopsis: fastjar update (-u) should be implemented >Arrival-Date: Sun Sep 08

Processed: reassign bugs for packages not beeing built from gcc-3.1 source anymore

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 151886 gcc-3.2 Bug#151886: maxima_5.6a-2(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs porting work for hppa? Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1' to `gcc-3.2'. > reassign 151182 g++-3.2 Bug#151182: g++-3.1: struct problems Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.

Processed: gcc: submitted Debian report #116145 to gcc-gnats as PR libgcj/7854

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 116145 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#116145: update (-u) should be implemented Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > retitle 116145 [PR libgcj/7854] fastjar update (-u) should be implemented Bug#116145: update (-u) s

Bug#160093: conflicting file ownership in libstdc++4 and gcc-3.2-nof

Package: libstdc++4 Version: 3.1.1-3 This newest version conflicts with the current gcc-3.2-nof as follows.. Unpacking replacement libstdc++4 ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libstdc++4_1%3a3.1.1-3_powerpc.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/nof/libsupc++.la', which

Bug#160175: gcc-3.2: missing message catalogs

Package: gcc-3.2 Version: 1:3.2.1-0pre1 Severity: normal gcc-3.1 package included message catalogs. But gcc-3.2 package seems to miss them. gcc-3.2 is built with `-enable-nls' configure option, so I think this is bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Ker