Hi,
The excuses file for cssc tells it's no promoted because it shows a
dep on gcc-3.1, which I don't feel is normal. I found out that the
ia64 binary says:
Depends: libc6.1 (>= 2.2.4-4), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.1), libstdc++3 (>= 1:3.0.3-1)
Whereas I had put in the build-deps " g++-3.0 [ia64]", and th
Yann Dirson writes:
> Hi,
>
> The excuses file for cssc tells it's no promoted because it shows a
> dep on gcc-3.1, which I don't feel is normal. I found out that the
> ia64 binary says:
>
> Depends: libc6.1 (>= 2.2.4-4), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.1), libstdc++3 (>= 1:3.0.3-1)
>
> Whereas I had put in th
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 11:03:49AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> The shared libgcc1 is built by gcc-3.0 and gcc-3.1. The libgcc1
> package is built from the gcc-3.1 sources.
Ah, OK.
> > What's silly about that is that gcc-3.1 only seems to be held out of
> > testing because an error in copyright
Package: gcc-3.1
Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre3
The official gcc 3.1.1 release tarballs are now available
at gcc.gnu.org's ftp site in /pub/gcc/releases/gcc-3.1.1.
Can we get a new build with of this package with the official
release?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
DEAR FRIEND.
RE-BUSINESS PROPOSAL
I wish this my proposal will not come to you as a
surprise.
I am Mr. SOJI ANI, a Regional Director with a NATIONAL TRUST SECURITY COMPANY
with regional Office in
Lome-Togo.
We had a foreign client (name with held) who deposited
a huge sum of money (US$28.5millio
Jack Howarth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: gcc-3.1
> Version: 1:3.1.1-0pre3
>
> The official gcc 3.1.1 release tarballs are now available
> at gcc.gnu.org's ftp site in /pub/gcc/releases/gcc-3.1.1.
> Can we get a new build with of this package with the official
> release?
Jack,
I think
> I think GCC maintainers are aware of GCC releases.
> No need to file a bug every time a new GCC is being released.
> It is harassing.
I agree. Also, the new release scripts take some time to run and verify
that the tarballs are correct. Until the announcement goes out on the
gcc-announce list
Sorry. I posted it because there appears to be a lag
between when the tarballs are posted and the announcement
of their availablity. The gcc 3.1.1 announcement still hasn't
been made...perhaps to allow the mirrors to populate. In any
case, this was more of a wishlist bug report and a heads up
o
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 12:31:01PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
>Sorry. I posted it because there appears to be a lag
> between when the tarballs are posted and the announcement
> of their availablity. The gcc 3.1.1 announcement still hasn't
> been made...perhaps to allow the mirrors to populate.
Phil,
Actually, it looks like it will be trivial to build these packages
anyway. Using the release tarball and the current debian directory from
the last gcc-3.1-3.1.1ds2 pre3 build, all of the patches apply cleanly.
So all anyone needs to is 'apt-get source gcc-3.1', replace the
gcc-20020703.ta
10 matches
Mail list logo
