Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc

reassign 153816 gcc merge153816 112887 thanks gcc-3.1 doesn't use alternatives to make sure that the preferred system compiler is used when calling 'gcc'. If you want to test gcc-3.1 for a particular package, - use CC=gcc-3.1 CXX=g++-3.1 when configuring/compiling a package - make ~/bin/gcc a sy

Processed: Re: Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 153816 gcc Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc Bug reassigned from package `gcc-3.1' to `gcc'. > merge153816 112887 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assist

Processed: Re: Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 153816 112887 Bug#112887: gcc in alternatives? Bug#153816: gcc-3.1 doesn't provide cc Bug#115353: gcc: cc & gcc should use update-alternatives mechanism Bug#119064: gcc-3.0: doesn't depend on gcc Bug#119952: gcc-3.0: could gcc-3.0 be hooked into t

Bug#150050: acknowledged by developer (fixed in gcc-2.95.3)

Hi, Thanks for the reply. I realize that as of the recent release of 3.0 stable, of course, this issue is less important, and as I was compiling a program from the previous testing under the previous stable, the reported bug was hardly critical. However, as I understand it, the bug indicated a p