https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receivi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
felix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de
--- Comment #9 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
felix changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||felix.von.s at posteo dot de
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org
--
You are receiv
--- Comment #5 from chris dot pickett at mail dot mcgill dot ca 2008-03-03
02:55 ---
Maybe you could fix the preprocessor to warn about operators with known side
effects. Can cpp see the entire expr in assert (expr)? If so, just search the
tokens for =, ++, --, +=, -=, etc.
--
chr
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-15 19:45 ---
*** Bug 29480 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
fang at csl dot cornell dot edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fang at csl dot cornell dot
|
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-09-10 16:23:19 |2005-12-10 05:43:37
date||
--- Additional Comments From mbp at sourcefrog dot net 2004-08-10 23:56
---
It might be nice if there were a compile-time function similar to
__builtin_constant_p which checked whether an expression was free of
side-effects.One could then write
# define assert(expr) \
(__built
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|2003-10-01 04:02:16 |2003-12-31 16:03:17
date|
PLEASE REPLY TO [EMAIL PROTECTED] ONLY, *NOT* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6906
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|[EM
Synopsis: warn about asserts with side effects
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 7 17:40:58 2003
State-Changed-Why:
As much as I sympathize with the goal of such a warning, I
doubt it will be possible to implement it. The rea
Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `c/6906'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: unassigned.
>Category: c
>Responsible:unassigned
>Synopsis: warn about asserts with side effects
>Arrival-Date: Sat Ju
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Organization: The Debian Project
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: change-request
>Release: 3.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Enviro
19 matches
Mail list logo
