Re: updating gcc-3.3 to the final gcc-3.3.2 release for sarge

2003-09-28 Thread Anthony Towns
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 03:28:19AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Anthony Towns wrote: > >FYI: Note that I've forced the current version of gcc-3.3 into testing > >for tomorrow's dinstall; in spite of it being broken on arm, and unbuilt > >on m68k. This will ease a bunch of problems, but is still

Re: updating gcc-3.3 to the final gcc-3.3.2 release for sarge

2003-09-28 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Anthony Towns wrote: >FYI: Note that I've forced the current version of gcc-3.3 into testing >for tomorrow's dinstall; in spite of it being broken on arm, and unbuilt >on m68k. This will ease a bunch of problems, but is still causing major >hassles for Qt and KDE, so we still need a properly fixed

updating gcc-3.3 to the final gcc-3.3.2 release for sarge

2003-09-25 Thread Matthias Klose
gcc-3.3.2 is supposed to be release in early October. Since the last snapshot in Debian, at least one wrong-code-gen bug and one regression reported to the Debian BTS is fixed upstream (besides 10 other regressions). Although the toolchain packages are frozen, I want to update the gcc-3.3 packages

Re: updating gcc-3.3 to the final gcc-3.3.2 release for sarge

2003-09-25 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > gcc-3.3.2 is supposed to be release in early October. Since the last > snapshot in Debian, at least one wrong-code-gen bug and one regression > reported to the Debian BTS is fixed upstream (besides 10 other > regressions). > > Altho