Source: elfutils
Version: 0.191-1
Severity: important
All test failures during make check are ignored, see the following line
in debian/rules:
-LC_CTYPE=C $(MAKE) check $(USE_JOBS) || { cat tests/test-suite.log; exit 1; }
Please drop the initial hyphen to ensure that the build fails in case of
Your message dated Thu, 14 Dec 2023 19:21:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#1057635: fixed in gcc-13 13.2.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #1057635,
regarding Fix gcc-13 test failures during package build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
t;norepro",
"default" }.
Also made standalone tests for the has_deb_build_options() function.
Regards,
Gwenole.
Le jeu. 7 déc. 2023 à 10:45, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>
> On 06.12.23 10:30, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
> > Package: gcc-13
> > Version: 13.2.0-7
>
On 06.12.23 10:30, Gwenole Beauchesne wrote:
Package: gcc-13
Version: 13.2.0-7
The gcc-ice-dump.diff patch causes the GCC driver to test for the
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS environment variable and generate extra debug output
when an ICE occurs, for instance. This is an interesting feature,
while
Package: gcc-13
Version: 13.2.0-7
The gcc-ice-dump.diff patch causes the GCC driver to test for the
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS environment variable and generate extra debug output
when an ICE occurs, for instance. This is an interesting feature,
while building other packages, but not while building GCC
alter fixed versions of bug #1055750 to the same values
previously set
> forwarded 1055228 https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/
Bug #1055228 [plplot] plplot: FTBFS on armhf (test segfault)
Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#1055228 to the same
value
> merge -1
Control: reassign -1 plplot
Control: forwarded 1055228 https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/
Control: merge -1 1055228
* Emanuele Rocca [2023-11-16 09:30]:
To be honest I think it's safe to close 1055750 (gfortran) and mark
1055228 (plplot) as forwarded upstream though, I don't think we h
Hi Rafael,
On 2023-11-16 08:42, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/
>
> * Rafael Laboissière [2023-11-16 07:51]:
>
> > My guess is that the bug is in PLplot and not in gfortran, but this is
> > just a guess. I will eventually inform the P
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/
Bug #1055750 [gfortran] gfortran: [armhf] Yield SIGBUS when compiling with
-fstack-clash-protection
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/'.
--
1055750: https://bugs.debia
Control: forwarded -1 https://sourceforge.net/p/plplot/bugs/206/
* Rafael Laboissière [2023-11-16 07:51]:
My guess is that the bug is in PLplot and not in gfortran, but this is
just a guess. I will eventually inform the PLplot upstream authors
about the issue.
Done !
R.
* Emanuele Rocca [2023-11-15 20:11]:
On 2023-11-15 06:47, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
Does this mean that the origin of the bug is upstream or that it still may
be a bug in gfortran?
At this point we know for sure that the issue is not armhf-specific, and
also that it is not caused by stack-c
Hello Rafael!
On 2023-11-15 06:47, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
> Does this mean that the origin of the bug is upstream or that it still may
> be a bug in gfortran?
At this point we know for sure that the issue is not armhf-specific, and
also that it is not caused by stack-clash-protection. On the c
Hi Emanuele,
Our messages crossed.
* Emanuele Rocca [2023-11-15 18:20]:
On 2023-11-09 05:11, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
The Fortran example x09f.f90, which is exercised during the building of
plplot, now fails on armhf, due to the use of the compiler option
-fstack-clash-protection.
The pro
Please could you prepare a self-contained test case, either adding the required
included files, or providing the preprocessed source?
Also, please with the recent GCC 11, 12 versions in unstable, and the GCC 13
snapshot in experimental.
Subject: gcc-12: Miscompilation of attached test files, gcc-11 ok
Package: gcc-12
X-Debbugs-Cc: c...@debian.org
Version: 12.2.0-9
Severity: important
This prevents GCL using gcc-12.
=
File: t.c
for the other package (or clone), and add a block in this
|package. Please keep the issue open until the package can be built in
|a follow-up test rebuild.
|
|The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with
|gcc-12/g++-12, but succeeds to build with gcc-11/g++-11. The
|severity
Your message dated Thu, 18 Nov 2021 08:39:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#999845: fixed in debugedit 1:5.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #999845,
regarding debugedit test failures on hppa
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Package: src:debugedit
Version: 1:5.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-h...@lists.debian.org
Forwarded: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28598
debugedit shows some test failures on hppa:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=debugedit&
Package: src:debugedit
Version: 1:5.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: sid bookworm
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-m...@lists.debian.org
Forwarded: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28599
debugedit shows some test failures on mips64el:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=debugedit&
7;/<>/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/tests/../cvise.py blocksort-part.c -c
"gcc -c blocksort-part.c && grep nextHi blocksort-part.c"' returned non-zero
exit status 1.
/usr/lib/python3.9/subprocess.py:528: CalledProcessError
- Captured stderr call
: Installed libgccjit has failed passing the smoke test.
You can verify it yourself compiling:
<https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/intro/tutorial01.html>.
Please report the issue to your distribution if libgccjit was installed through
that.
Here instructions on how to compile and install lib
of course inferior to having them
> actually provided by the relevant source package.
> https://salsa.debian.org/rpavlik/gcc-10-compat (I only mocked up/built
> the packages required to test on x86_64/i386, but I'd expect the same
> problem and solution on the other platforms that have a
by the relevant source package.
https://salsa.debian.org/rpavlik/gcc-10-compat (I only mocked up/built
the packages required to test on x86_64/i386, but I'd expect the same
problem and solution on the other platforms that have additional libgcc
packages.)
I have a reproducible test case: I did
Hello again,
The attached patch libgo_go_syscall_export_unix_test.go.diff fixes one failing
test of libgo: syscall. Maybe it could be added to the patch already submitted
patch in this bug report.
Thanks!
--- a/src/libgo/go/syscall/export_unix_test.go 2017-05-10 19:26:09.0 +0200
+++ b
Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2019 03:13:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920171: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #836944,
regarding gcc: autoconf test failing on amd64 with -pie -static combination
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:00:21 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#920166: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #819429,
regarding libstdc++-5-dev: Kodi test crashes in STL on armel and armhf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#888422: fixed in mpfr4 4.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #888422,
regarding giac test failures with mpfr 4.0.0 on several architectures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 871514 + ngircd
Bug #871514 [gcc-7] clamav: FTBFS on mips64el
Bug #871538 [gcc-7] Makes apparmor FTBFS on mips64el (generated code thinks
that 1 > 1)
Added indication that 871514 affects ngircd
Added indication that 871538 affects ngircd
Here are the results of a first test rebuild of the Debian (amd64) and Ubuntu
(all architectures) archives. The test was started with a GCC trunk around
20161202, and then build failures were retried later with r243559. I filed
around 10-15 issues for ICEs, the most of them already fixed on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1373
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Your message dated Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:15:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#838316: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #785249,
regarding gcc-4.9: test suite errors when memory overcommitting is turned off
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: gcc-6
Version: 6.2.0-3
--
Hi,
I've got an issue close to this one
: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16428
(unstable)debian@vm81:~$ cat conftest.c
int main() { return 0; }
(unstable)debian@vm81:~$ gcc -fPIE -pie -static conftest1.c
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-g
Your message dated Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:58:56 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#833430: creduce doesn't pass the files to reduce to
the test script
has caused the Debian Bug report #833430,
regarding creduce doesn't pass the files to reduce to the test script
to be mark
On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 11:26:58AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Package: creduce
> Version: 2.5.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid stretch
>
> creduce doesn't pass the files to reduce to the test script. This used to
> work ...
>
> $ creduce --debug ./cr2.sh
Package: creduce
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid stretch
creduce doesn't pass the files to reduce to the test script. This used to work
...
$ creduce --debug ./cr2.sh foo.c
successfully checked prereqs for pass_include_includes
successfully checked prereqs for pass_inc
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:ucl
Bug #811707 [gcc-6] gcc-6 fails to compile a valid code
Bug reassigned from package 'gcc-6' to 'src:ucl'.
No longer marked as found in versions gcc-6/6-20160228-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #811707 to the same values
previou
Control: reassign -1 src:ucl
both gcc-5 and gcc-6 show the same error message:
$ gcc-6 -c test.c
test.c:1:12: error: size of array '__acc_cta' is negative
extern int __acc_cta[1-2*!((1l << (8*4 -1)) < 0)];
^
Package: libstdc++-5-dev
Version: 5.3.1-13
Control: affects -1 kodi
Dear Maintainer,
Kodi fails to build on armel and armhf due to a crashing test:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=kodi&arch=armhf&ver=16.0%2Bdfsg1-2&stamp=1458793597
...
[--] 1 test from TestScra
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 kodi
Bug #819429 [libstdc++-5-dev] libstdc++-5-dev: Kodi test crashes in STL on
armel and armhf
Added indication that 819429 affects kodi
--
819429: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819429
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 811707 gcc-6 6-20160228-1
Bug #811707 [ucl] FTBFS with GCC 6: compiler failed the ACC conformance test
Bug reassigned from package 'ucl' to 'gcc-6'.
No longer marked as found in versions 1.03+repack-3.
Ignoring
RCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
> checking whether your compiler passes the ACC conformance test... FAILED
> configure:
> configure: Your compiler failed the ACC conformance test - for details
see
> configure: `config.log'. Please check that log file and consider send
Your message dated Sun, 07 Feb 2016 00:08:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#812287: fixed in gcc-6 6-20160205-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #812287,
regarding test suites segfault / constexpr leaves reference member var
uninitialized
to be marked as done.
This means that you
reopen 812287
reassign 812287 gcc-6 6-20160117-1
retitle 812287 test suites segfault / constexpr leaves reference member var
uninitialized
forwarded 812287 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69327
thanks
* Rene Engelhard [2016-01-22 13:01]:
> That reminds me of
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 812287
Bug #812287 {Done: Rene Engelhard } [libetonyek] libetonyek:
FTBFS with GCC 6: test suite segfaults
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #812287 to the same values
previously set
> reassign 812287 g
. See below.
> possible I reported a non-issue, although I tried to avoid that.
It probably is. See below.
> I apologize in advance if this is the case.
No problem.
> If you have some time to look into this issue, that'd be great. If
> not, I can re-test the package with GCC 6 in
reads:
--8><--
[...]
Starting program: /home/calculus/normaliz/normaliz-00/normaliz/_build/normaliz
-h test-h/cut.in
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/
Your message dated Fri, 21 Aug 2015 13:43:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796274: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #635214,
regarding gcc-4.6: [sparc] miscompile PARI/GP 2.5.0 [test-case provided]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:09:36 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#796148: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #671368,
regarding 100% acats test failures on armel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Wed, 05 Aug 2015 12:25:04 +0200
with message-id <55c1e480.1020...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#794605: gcc-5-plugin-dev: A simpel test to see if
gcc-5-plugin-dev works yields as result:
has caused the Debian Bug report #794605,
regarding gcc-5-plugin-dev: A simpe
, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
The test used can be used from the CLI:
gcc -E -shared - -o /dev/null -I`gcc -print-file-name=plugin`/include 2>&1 <:1:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/plugin/include/hash-table.h:201:15: f
Your message dated Sun, 05 Jul 2015 16:18:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#707276: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #593324,
regarding [armel] g++-4.4 -O1 makes ppl test suite fail
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR66154
Bug #785249 [gcc-4.9] gcc-4.9: test suite errors when memory overcommitting is
turned off
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gcc.gnu.org/PR66154'.
> tags -1 + upstream
Bug #785249 [gcc-4.9] gcc-4.9: t
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR66154
Control: tags -1 + upstream
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e307.3080...@debian.org
Package: gcc-4.9
Version: 4.9.2-10
Severity: normal
When I tried building gcc from sources (debuild -us -uc), I got a
number of errors like this:
FAIL: g++.dg/asan/interception-malloc-test-1.C -O1 output pattern test, is
==25380==ERROR: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0xdfff0001000
Your message dated Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:33:57 +0200
with message-id <540726d5.4040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#735006: gcc-4.9: amd64 kernel gives error alg: hash:
Chunking test 1 failed for hmac(md5-generic)
has caused the Debian Bug report #735006,
regarding gcc-4.9: amd64
Your message dated Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:57:22 +0200
with message-id <53d61e82.1030...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#756266: g++-4.9: test summaries compressed twice (and
why install them at all..?)
has caused the Debian Bug report #756266,
regarding g++-4.9: test summaries compressed
Package: g++-4.9
Version: 4.9.1-3
Severity: minor
Many of the files in /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.9-base are compressed by xz
then by gz. This seems wrong. (Reporting to g++-4.9 since that package
owns the files.)
% ls -l /usr/share/doc/gcc-4.9-base/test-summaries
total 15316
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 11:51:16 +0200
with message-id <533fd214.9060...@debian.org>
and subject line closing old bug reports in gcc-snapshot
has caused the Debian Bug report #713323,
regarding gcc-snapshot: FTBFS: There were fixinclude test FAILURES
to be marked as done.
This
On 24 January 2014 10:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> brainparty, igstk:
> error: redeclaration of '...' may not have default arguments [-fpermissive]
G++ was fixed to reject this, the code is invalid.
>
> apron, cadabra:
> error: 'ptrdiff_t' does not name a type
These should be qualifying the
On 24 January 2014 10:08, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> 0ad, aria2, cupt, dssp, fish, fldigi, iverilog, mednafen, mkvtoolnix, mrs,
> nmap, v4l-utils:
> error: converting to '...' from initializer list would use explicit
> constructor '...'
That one was a GCC problem, fixed by
http://gcc.gnu.org/view
Here are some preliminary results of a test rebuild on x86_64-linux-gnu with
trunk 20140118, for all 10755 source packages building architecture dependent
binary packages. Compared to the current gcc-4.8 in Debian unstable, there were
103 new build failures. The gcc-4.9 packages used can be found
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 wishlist
Bug #735006 [gcc-4.9] gcc-4.9: amd64 kernel gives error alg: hash: Chunking
test 1 failed for hmac(md5-generic)
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
--
735006: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Am 11.01.2014 19:26, schrieb Arthur Marsh:
> Package: gcc-4.9
> Version: 4.9-20140110-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
> *** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
>
>* What led up to the situation?
>
> building current git he
Key type cifs.idmap registered
[ 55.421943] alg: hash: Chunking test 1 failed for hmac(md5-generic)
[ 55.427058] : 53 49 32 30 a0 a8 ec 9f 4d 64 c9 74 62 52 20 d2
[ 55.432172] CIFS VFS: could not allocate crypto hmacmd5
[ 55.437212] CIFS VFS: could not crypto alloc hmacmd5 rc -2
[
on).
Could you please check if the above differences are important to your
packages? You can try to test your package against experimental
`realpath 1.19.coreutils.1' that is built from the coreutils sources.
For the transition itself, since the gcc-* packages have versioned
build-depend
ts/string2.h
> Fixed: bsd/libc.h
> Fixed: c_asm.h
> Fixed: com_err.h
> Fixed: complex.h
> Fixed: ctrl-quotes-def-1.h
> Fixed: ctype.h
> Fixed: curses.h
> Fixed: errno.h
> Fixed: features.h
> Fixed: fixinc-test-limits.h
> Fixed: hsfs/hsfs_spec.h
> Fixed:
ch gcc-4.6 can pick up as an error or warning in
the qmf sources.
Reinstalling gcc-4.7 & g++-4.7 and rebuilding with the same flags
(and the #include patch) does not indicate any problems with
the qmfclient library itself, g++-4.7 just fails to link the test
binary.
--
Neil Williams
Package: gnat-4.6
Version: 4.6.3-3
Severity: important
seen on the armel build log ...
=== acats support ===
Generating support files...sed: -e expression #2, char 165: unterminated `s'
command
... and all acats tests fail
this fails:
target_gnatmake $testdir/support/impbit.adb
Hi,
Attached is a standalone test case for this bug, obtained on an
up-to-date sid/sparc system. With it I see the following behavior:
jurij@debian:~$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/sparc-linux-gnu/4.6/lto-wrapper
Target: sparc-linux-gnu
Configured
oat rework.
* Add a new libffi5.symbols.powerpcspe file copied from powerpc.
I have performed a native build of this patch on a PowerPC64 system,
compiling both the libffi5 and lib64ffi5 versions successfully, with no
test-suite failures.
Unfortunately I am having issues with my powerpcspe build
>> The attached patch resolves both issues.
>
> and ftbfs on powerpc:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libffi&arch=powerpc&ver=3.0.10-2&stamp=1318082452
Ahh, damn, Ok. New patch coming shortly, sorry about that.
I'll see if I can use one of the I
On 10/05/2011 12:12 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> Package: libffi
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch upstream
> User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
> Usertags: powerpcspe
>
> The Debian-Ports "powerpcspe" architecture can't currently build the
> libffi package for a couple reasons:
>
> (1) The pack
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2011 13:32:53 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644338: fixed in libffi 3.0.10-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #644338,
regarding libffi: Build errors on PowerPC e500, test-suite failures on PowerPC
soft-float
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 08 Oct 2011 12:03:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#644338: fixed in libffi 3.0.11~rc1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #644338,
regarding libffi: Build errors on PowerPC e500, test-suite failures on PowerPC
soft-float
to be marked as done.
This means that
rom: "Moffett, Kyle D"
> Date: October 04, 2011 18:12:27 EDT
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System
> Subject: libffi: Build errors on PowerPC e500, test-suite failures on PowerPC
> soft-float
>
> Package: libffi
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch upstream
> User: de
please forward this upstream.
On 10/05/2011 12:12 AM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> Package: libffi
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch upstream
> User: debian-powerpc...@breakpoint.cc
> Usertags: powerpcspe
>
> The Debian-Ports "powerpcspe" architecture can't currently build the
> libffi package for a coup
f (typenum == FFI_TYPE_DOUBLE)
+ typenum = FFI_TYPE_UINT64;
+ if (typenum == FFI_TYPE_LONGDOUBLE)
+ typenum = FFI_TYPE_UINT128;
+ } else if (ecif->cif->abi != FFI_LINUX) {
+#if FFI_TYPE_LONGDOUBLE != FFI_TYPE_DOUBLE
+ if (typenum == FFI_TYPE_
Hello GCC maintainers,
Please find a smaller test-case.
smetana% gcc -O3 -Wall -g test.c -o test
smetana% ./test
zsh: segmentation fault ./test
smetana% gcc -O3 -Wall -g test.c -o test -fno-inline
smetana% ./test
smetana%
Cheers,
--
Bill.
Imagine a large red swirl here.
#include
inline
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 11:14:34PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> #include
> inline void*
> pari_realloc(void *pointer, size_t size)
> {
> char *tmp;
> if (!pointer)
> tmp = (char *) malloc(size);
> else
> tmp = (char *) realloc(pointer,size);
Please fix the obvious problems:
- Neve
Package: gcc-4.6
Version: 4.6.1-4
Severity: normal
Hello Debian GCC Maintainers,
gcc-4.6 miscompiles pari 2.5.0 on sparc, see
See
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=pari&arch=sparc&ver=2.5.0-1&stamp=1311418380
Please find a small test-case attached (test.c)
gcc -O2 -
Hi, Debian GCC Maintainers.
I noticed that test of gcc was disabled from gcc_4.6-13.
This is not written in debian changelog.
Could you teach the reason?
# It is a change to architecture to make CPU with slow speed a target glad :-)
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
iwamatsu at
?
>> - How to overcome the problem?
>
> caused by the ld --no-add-needed default? Link libnetpbm.so with -lm.
> See http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking
Matthias, thank you a lot. "-Wl,--as-needed" argument looks to play the
essential role! So the original test scrip
On 31.03.2011 18:29, Dmitry Katsubo wrote:
> Dear developers,
>
> I hope somebody in this maillist can help me with my (perhaps trivial)
> problem.
>
> I have written autoconf script, which among all other checks performs
> the following test:
>
> AC_LANG([C
Dear developers,
I hope somebody in this maillist can help me with my (perhaps trivial)
problem.
I have written autoconf script, which among all other checks performs
the following test:
AC_LANG([C++])
...
AC_SEARCH_LIBS([pnm_readpnminit], [netpbm pnm])
The resulting configure script works
Package: g++-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-8
(Leaving choice of severity to gcc maintainers; at the current stage ppl cannot
migrate to testing although it would fix an RC bug.)
ppl 0.10.2-7 FTBS on armel [1] (exclusively) with test suite failures; this was
extremely surprising as 0.10.2-6 was fine [2] and
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Arthur Loiret wrote:
> Thanks for your test case. Could you please try again with
> gcc-4.5/libgomp1 from experimental?
Thanks for the interest! I don't have a machine I can butcher with an
experimental GCC right now, unfortunately, but VIPS actually w
Hi!
Thanks for your test case. Could you please try again with
gcc-4.5/libgomp1 from experimental?
Thanks!
Arthur.
2009/8/21, Ole Laursen :
> Hi!
>
> Forgot to attach a test case. It's really simple. Install
> python-vipscc and run the following (and also attached) Python s
On 23.02.2010 23:47, Falk Hueffner wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:55:42AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
This test program will segfault at -O2 on the affected machines:
Can you please repost the attachment? It is not retrievable from the
BTS at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jun 2010 05:19:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#582787: fixed in gcc-4.5 4.5.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #582787,
regarding gcc-4.4: [hppa] Test tstdiomisc fails when multiplication of NAN by
-1 results in NAN again.
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Thu, 03 Jun 2010 05:03:30 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#582787: fixed in gcc-4.4 4.4.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #582787,
regarding gcc-4.4: [hppa] Test tstdiomisc fails when multiplication of NAN by
-1 results in NAN again.
to be marked as done.
This
Package: gcc-4.4
Version: 4.4.4-2
- Forwarded message from Carlos O'Donell -
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 22:58:18 -0400
From: Carlos O'Donell
To: John David Anglin ,
Debian HPPA Port List ,
libc-po...@sourceware.org
Subject: Test tstdiomisc fails when multiplicat
u/libgfortran'
> | make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-snapshot-20100310/build'
> | make[2]: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
> | make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-s
eebsd-gnu/libgfortran'
| make[3]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-snapshot-20100310/build'
| make[2]: *** [bootstrap-lean] Error 2
| make[2]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-snapshot-201
directory
`/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-snapshot-20100310/build'
| s=`cat status`; rm -f status; test $s -eq 0
| make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-stamp] Error 1
| make[1]: Leaving directory
`/build/buildd-gcc-snapshot_20100310-1-kfreebsd-i386-c6zRmm/gcc-sna
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 09:55:42AM -0500, Camm Maguire wrote:
> This test program will segfault at -O2 on the affected machines:
Can you please repost the attachment? It is not retrievable from the
BTS at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567695 ...
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCR
This test program will segfault at -O2 on the affected machines:
Take care,
--
Camm Maguirec...@maguirefamily.org
==
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its cit
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:13:19 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> In both cases it would be nice if you'd tag those bugs (FTBFS with
> gcc-4.4 and 4.5) with sid+squeeze, so that they dont show up as RC
> bugs for stable, for packages which have the same version in lenny.
>
Except you don't want the
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 13. Januar 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> >> Please also tag them sid (and squeeze?), so they wont show up affecting
> >> stable, if the version in stable is the same as in sid...
> >
> > I wouldn't worry about that just yet. Unless we're planning
> > on switching to gcc-4.5 before the
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Please don't forget to usertag the reports. Using the "ftbfs-gcc-4.5"
> > usertag should make it easier to track them (which would later make them
> > show up on the d
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:20:38AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Dienstag, 12. Januar 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>>> Please don't forget to usertag the reports. Using the "ftbfs-gcc-4.5"
>>> usertag should make it easier to track them (which would later make th
1 - 100 of 267 matches
Mail list logo
