Re: powerpc nof package could use reviving in 3.0

2001-07-10 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:20:34AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > ... or we need to come up with a more standard way of dealing with GCC > > multilibs, or decide to turn them off. Right now the soft-float ("nof") > > libstdc++ is in the main gcc package! > > Phil

Re: powerpc nof package could use reviving in 3.0

2001-07-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 11:20:34AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > ... or we need to come up with a more standard way of dealing with GCC > > multilibs, or decide to turn them off. Right now the soft-float ("nof") > > libstdc++ is in the main gcc package! > > Phil

Re: powerpc nof package could use reviving in 3.0

2001-07-08 Thread Philip Blundell
>Phil disabled the softfloat package for arm, m68k doesn't build (yet), >the other architectures don't built with multilibs configured. Let's Yeah. I turned it off for arm because it isn't much use (and indeed prevents the package from building) if you don't also have a soft-float version of gl

powerpc nof package could use reviving in 3.0

2001-07-08 Thread Matthias Klose
Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > ... or we need to come up with a more standard way of dealing with GCC > multilibs, or decide to turn them off. Right now the soft-float ("nof") > libstdc++ is in the main gcc package! Phil disabled the softfloat package for arm, m68k doesn't build (yet), the other

powerpc nof package could use reviving in 3.0

2001-07-06 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
... or we need to come up with a more standard way of dealing with GCC multilibs, or decide to turn them off. Right now the soft-float ("nof") libstdc++ is in the main gcc package! -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software