age-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:50:49 -0600
From: Ravenhall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913
Debian/1.1-1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
-get
and a few other packages were broken. Each gave me the
error message saying it couldn't find
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
I tinkered around and found that the problems was that the
new package created the file:
/usr/lib/libstdc++libc6.2-2.so.3
^^
no hyphen
I
Philou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: base: typo in libstdc++libc6.2-2.so.3 library name breaks dependencies
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 01:05:37 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6
Package: libstdc++3
Version: 1:3.0.4-13
After running a dist-upgrade today from unstable, several programs
(including apt-cache, apt-get, and mozilla) would give the following
error when attempting to launch them from a console:
error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
t; } > libstdc++. It looks like libstdc++.so.5 is the g++ 3.2 library, but
there
} > } > is also that libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 which nothing seems to use. Can
} > } > anyone explain this extraneous dependency?
[...]
} Two things to check:
}
} - Is it really happening? Run the applica
Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Did you take a look at the ldd -v output? It shows none of the
> shared objects depending on that strange libstdc++. Also, AFAIK, I
> am only using three C++ libraries: Qt, Xerces, and glut; I have
> compiled each of them with apt-get source --compile
Joel Baker sez:
[...]
} Er. Are any of the libraries you depend on linked against the old libstdc++
} (say, if any of *them* are C++ libraries, and haven't been recompiled with
} GCC 3.2 - this being the whole situation that leads to the requirement for
} juggling things carefully in the GCC versio
It looks like libstdc++.so.5 is the g++ 3.2 library, but there
> } > is also that libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 which nothing seems to use. Can
> } > anyone explain this extraneous dependency?
> } >
> } > The output from ldd -v is below.
> }
> } Presumably something is not link
It looks like libstdc++.so.5 is the g++ 3.2 library, but there
> } > is also that libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 which nothing seems to use. Can
> } > anyone explain this extraneous dependency?
> } >
> } > The output from ldd -v is below.
> }
> } Presumably something is not linkin
} > but ldd gives the same output as before.
} >
} > I don't understand why my program seems to be linked to two versions of
} > libstdc++. It looks like libstdc++.so.5 is the g++ 3.2 library, but there
} > is also that libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 which nothing seems to use. Ca
>
> I don't understand why my program seems to be linked to two versions of
> libstdc++. It looks like libstdc++.so.5 is the g++ 3.2 library, but there
> is also that libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 which nothing seems to use. Can
> anyone explain this extraneous dependency?
>
> T
.5 is the g++ 3.2 library, but there
is also that libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3 which nothing seems to use. Can
anyone explain this extraneous dependency?
The output from ldd -v is below.
--Greg
libqt-mt.so.3 => /usr/lib/libqt-mt.so.3 (0x4001e000)
libxerces-c.so.21 => /usr/lib/lib
12 matches
Mail list logo
