Re: libgnat version might be erroneous

2002-05-23 Thread Jérôme Marant
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jérôme Marant writes: >> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: >> > >> >> I've read in the gcc ML that versioning libgnat as 3.15a >> >> is erroneous, according to Robert Dewar. >> > >> > It's

Re: libgnat version might be erroneous

2002-05-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Jérôme Marant writes: > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > > > >> I've read in the gcc ML that versioning libgnat as 3.15a > >> is erroneous, according to Robert Dewar. > > > > It's still in the GCC CVS... > > And what's problematic

Re: libgnat version might be erroneous

2002-05-23 Thread Jérôme Marant
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > >> I've read in the gcc ML that versioning libgnat as 3.15a >> is erroneous, according to Robert Dewar. > > It's still in the GCC CVS... And what's problematic with deciding something on this, from GC

Re: libgnat version might be erroneous

2002-05-23 Thread Florian Weimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > I've read in the gcc ML that versioning libgnat as 3.15a > is erroneous, according to Robert Dewar. It's still in the GCC CVS... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

libgnat version might be erroneous

2002-05-23 Thread Jérôme Marant
Hi, I've read in the gcc ML that versioning libgnat as 3.15a is erroneous, according to Robert Dewar. The confusion was made when someone from ACT told that the libgnat from the GCC tree is _functionaly_ equivalent to libgnat 3.15a. I think that this point should be clarified. Ch