Re: help with gcc-3.2 related bug

2003-03-04 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, presumably he is linking using gcc to avoid libstdc++; is there > anything besides the missing library which g++ would change? Yes, there are minor differences: g++ adds -lm -lgcc_s, gcc adds -lgcc (or -lgcc_eh). Those shouldn't make a differe

Re: help with gcc-3.2 related bug

2003-03-03 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 01:28:57PM +0100, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have been suggested to ask for help here; please bounce me > > somewhere else if I am writing to the wrong address. I got a bug reported on > > libsablot0c102 package, which

Re: help with gcc-3.2 related bug

2003-03-03 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Fernando Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have been suggested to ask for help here; please bounce me > somewhere else if I am writing to the wrong address. I got a bug reported on > libsablot0c102 package, which appeared on the migration to gcc-3.2. Do you > recommend adding -lstdc++,

help with gcc-3.2 related bug

2003-03-03 Thread Fernando Sanchez
Hello, I have been suggested to ask for help here; please bounce me somewhere else if I am writing to the wrong address. I got a bug reported on libsablot0c102 package, which appeared on the migration to gcc-3.2. Do you recommend adding -lstdc++, or do you have a better advice? Thanks a lot