Matthias Klose writes:
> On 27.09.2012 09:38, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>> The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.
>
> so what didn't you understand?
How GCC is so sure of that. I now see that it does literally try to
reproduce the error by re-running cc1plus. ncbi-b
Le 9/27/12 3:37 PM, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> On 27.09.2012 09:38, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>> The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.
> so what didn't you understand?
This occurs on buildd servers, on Sparc only. I saw this bug faced the
same error, so I wonder if th
On 27.09.2012 09:38, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem.
so what didn't you understand?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archiv
Hi,
we got a gcc crash during Sparc package build on buildd servers.
could be same kind of issue.
/usr/bin/g++ -c -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -pthread -O2 -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fPIC-DNDEBUG
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE
gomp_resolve_num_threads.
(GOMP_parallel_start at parallel.c:70
> gomp_resolve_num_threads at parallel.c:48)
We are using MacOS 10.6.4 ,GCC 4.2 and xcode 3.2.2 .
Is there any solution for this?
-Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/gcc-crash.-tp29008522p29008522.html
S
Your message dated Mon, 31 May 2010 12:50:03 +0200
with message-id <4c03945b.5060...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#572653: gcc-4.3: compiling a 2.6.33 kernel results in
gcc crash
has caused the Debian Bug report #572653,
regarding gcc-4.3: compiling a 2.6.33 kernel results in gcc
Can you please close this bug. It was actually a buggy kernel I was
using to compiler the kernel on that was triggering the bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.d
tag 572653 + moreinfo
thanks
On 05.03.2010 14:59, david b wrote:
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See for instructions."
please do so.
does it work with 4.4?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 572653 + moreinfo
Bug #572653 [gcc-4.3] gcc-4.3: compiling a 2.6.33 kernel results in gcc crash
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
572653: http://bugs.debian.org/c
Package: gcc-4.3
Version: 4.3.2-1.1
Severity: normal
While compiling a 2.6.33 (modules) on an armel device I encountered the
following error:
"fs/afs/super.c: In function ‘afs_test_super’:
fs/afs/super.c:278: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with prepr
Falk Hueffner wrote:
Jason Dorje Short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Further information:
I can reproduce this crash, if I compile the file four times
simultanously. And I can reproduce it without using ccache.
Nearly certainly you're running out of memory. Please check that with
top.
Indeed, that
Jason Dorje Short <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Further information:
>
> I can reproduce this crash, if I compile the file four times
> simultanously. And I can reproduce it without using ccache.
Nearly certainly you're running out of memory. Please check that with
top.
--
Falk
Further information:
I can reproduce this crash, if I compile the file four times
simultanously. And I can reproduce it without using ccache.
jason
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 148603 g++-2.95
Bug#148603: gcc: crash when template declared after use
Bug reassigned from package `gcc' to `g++-2.95'.
> retitle 148603 [fixed in g++-3.1] crash when template declared after use
Bug#148603: gcc: crash when t
reassign 148603 g++-2.95
retitle 148603 [fixed in g++-3.1] crash when template declared after use
tags 148603 + fixed
thanks
unlikely to be fixed in g++-2.95. fixed in both g++-3.0 and g++-3.1
Glenn Maynard writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 2:2.95.4-15
> Severity: normal
>
> struct T {
>
Package: gcc
Version: 2:2.95.4-15
Severity: normal
struct T {
void A()
{
B("x");
}
template
void B(const T &n)
{
}
};
06:26pm [EMAIL PROTECTED]/5 [~/prob] g++ -g -Wall oops.cc
oops.cc: In method `void T::B(const char (&)[2])
16 matches
Mail list logo
