On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:32:49AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 05:51 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds.
> For reference the logs are at:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.9&arch
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 05:51 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds.
For reference the logs are at:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.9&arch=armel&ver=4.9-20140111-1&stamp=1389510444
build/genpreds -c .
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would it be
> better to default to some newer arm version like armv5t?
There is one Debian derivative, QtMoko, which is one of the few usable
distributions on the Openmoko Freerunner (gta02). Switch
Hi,
the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds.
Please could somebody from the arm porters look into this?
If I remember correctly we had some issues with the arm soft float port already
with gcc-4.7 and gcc-4.8. Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would it
4 matches
Mail list logo
