Re: gcc-4.6 kfreebsd build failure

Le 27/04/2011 12:35, Aurelien Jarno a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:08:11PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > Apparently gcc-4.5 is not good enough as a bootstrap compiler for gcc-4.6. > Please could somebody check/confirm that using gcc-4.4 as the bootstrap > compiler works around t

Re: gcc-4.6 kfreebsd build failure

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 07:08:11PM +0200, Petr Salinger wrote: > >>>Apparently gcc-4.5 is not good enough as a bootstrap compiler for gcc-4.6. > >>>Please could somebody check/confirm that using gcc-4.4 as the bootstrap > >>>compiler works around the build failure? > >> > >>As gcc-4.6 is already av

Re: gcc-4.6 kfreebsd build failure

Apparently gcc-4.5 is not good enough as a bootstrap compiler for gcc-4.6. Please could somebody check/confirm that using gcc-4.4 as the bootstrap compiler works around the build failure? As gcc-4.6 is already available on both kfreebsd-*, wouldn't be better to use gcc-4.6 as a bootstrap compile

Re: gcc-4.6 kfreebsd build failure

On 04/26/2011 06:01 PM, Petr Salinger wrote: Apparently gcc-4.5 is not good enough as a bootstrap compiler for gcc-4.6. Please could somebody check/confirm that using gcc-4.4 as the bootstrap compiler works around the build failure? As gcc-4.6 is already available on both kfreebsd-*, wouldn't b

Re: gcc-4.6 kfreebsd build failure

Apparently gcc-4.5 is not good enough as a bootstrap compiler for gcc-4.6. Please could somebody check/confirm that using gcc-4.4 as the bootstrap compiler works around the build failure? As gcc-4.6 is already available on both kfreebsd-*, wouldn't be better to use gcc-4.6 as a bootstrap compil

gcc-4.6 kfreebsd build failure

Apparently gcc-4.5 is not good enough as a bootstrap compiler for gcc-4.6. Please could somebody check/confirm that using gcc-4.4 as the bootstrap compiler works around the build failure? thanks, Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub