Re: gcc-4.3 update for lenny

Luk Claes schrieb: > Matthias Klose wrote: >> Luk Claes schrieb: >>> Matthias Klose wrote: Matthias Klose schrieb: > There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least > for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch > for wrong-code regres

Re: gcc-4.3 update for lenny

Matthias Klose wrote: > Luk Claes schrieb: >> Matthias Klose wrote: >>> Matthias Klose schrieb: There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prep

Re: gcc-4.3 update for lenny

Luk Claes schrieb: > Matthias Klose wrote: >> Matthias Klose schrieb: >>> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least >>> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch >>> for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1]. >>> No

Re: gcc-4.3 update for lenny

Matthias Klose wrote: > Matthias Klose schrieb: >> There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least >> for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch >> for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1]. >> No regressions found in the

Re: gcc-4.3 update for lenny

Matthias Klose schrieb: > There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least > for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch > for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1]. > No regressions found in the testsuite on i386 and powerp

gcc-4.3 update for lenny

There are some more regressions fixed on the gcc-4_3-branch. At least for some of those we should consider an update. I scanned the branch for wrong-code regressions with -O2/-O3 and prepared an update at [1]. No regressions found in the testsuite on i386 and powerpc. The alternative could be an