On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 11:02:16AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > Why is this a native Debian package? I know that the tarball it is based
> > on is not one distributed as such by upstream, but it is based on files
> > from an upstream source. The way you do it now, you can't see what you
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:06:02AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> > I've created gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg package, intended for non-free. This
> > package builds several binary packages (cpp-4.1-doc, gcc-4.1-doc,
> > gfortran-4.1-doc, tree;ang-4.1-doc), that contain all files - man
> > pages,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc
> documentation. Both myself and people to whom I recommend Debian,
> *need* gcc documentation to be available in the system.
The FSF agree with your position.
http://www.fsf.org/lic
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc documentation. Both
> myself and people to whom I recommend Debian, *need* gcc documentation to
> be available in the system.
>
> So I had four options:
> - start a new flamewar on the issue,
> - s
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 12:06:02AM +0400, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
> I've created gcc-4.1-doc-non-dfsg package, intended for non-free. This
> package builds several binary packages (cpp-4.1-doc, gcc-4.1-doc,
> gfortran-4.1-doc, tree;ang-4.1-doc), that contain all files - man pages,
> info a
Hello.
I'm one of those people beaten by recent removal of gcc documentation. Both
myself and people to whom I recommend Debian, *need* gcc documentation to
be available in the system.
So I had four options:
- start a new flamewar on the issue,
- stop to use Debian (and to recomment it),
- inst
6 matches
Mail list logo
