> > Current glibc does not support TLS under 2.4 kernels (see #226716),
> > so this is probalby glibc bug (some people call it feature).
> glibc does support TLS on all kernels (even non-linux ones), if there is
> the corresponding kernel support.
Unfortunately not absolutely,
nevertheless i38
> > > Current glibc does not support TLS under 2.4 kernels (see #226716),
> > > so this is probalby glibc bug (some people call it feature).
> > - provide TLS support for 2.4 kernels and an upgrade path?
> 2.4 kernels does not have the necessary stuff to support TLS,
> so that's not possible
Matthias Klose a écrit :
Steve Langasek writes:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
would like to know what does this exactly mean:
- That users are advised not to use them?
- That we could dr
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:44:26AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> - configure gcc with --disable-tls (on which architectures would that
> be (not) needed?)
amd64, maybe hppa. Anything with supports tla in sarge and don't ship
with 2.4 kernels.
> - build a libstdc++6 with a gcc, configured with
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:06:21PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > A few weeks ago, the 2.4 kernels have been declared "deprecated" [1]. I
> > would like to know what does this exactly mean:
> > - That users are advised not to use them?
> > - That we could drop support
5 matches
Mail list logo
