On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 07:03:55PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:02:29AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
> > #define LOW_WORD(x) (word)(x)
> > #define HIGH_WORD(x) (*(((word *)&(x))+1))
>
> You can't do this. I recommend you google for "strict aliasing" for a
> numbe
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:02:29AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had a look at the debian bug #225313. This bug only raise raise when
> optimization is used. I've submitted a patch, but would like to
> understand if gcc behaviour was normal.
>
>
> I've selected a sample of code t
2 matches
Mail list logo
