Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 369642 g++-4.0/alpha: -fvisibility-inlines-hidden segfaults on
> reference to static method
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 368883 -1
Bug#368883: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Bug 368883 cloned as bug 369642.
> reassign -1 g++-4.0
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on alpha
Bug reassigned from package `qt4-x11' to `g++-4.0'.
> severity -1 important
Bug#369642: qt4-x11: FTBFS on al
Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:47:19AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> > > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, a
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 09:47:19AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will
> > > give errors
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:31:07AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will
> > give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found.
> > Anyone know whether GCC 4.1 has th
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 03:22:50PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> qt4-x11 needs to be rebuilt on m68k, anything using it currently will
> give errors that libXcursor.la can't be found.
>
> Unfortunately, GCC 4.0 currently ICEs on QT4.
fwiw kdepim and koffice ICE the same way.
> Anyone
6 matches
Mail list logo