Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-12-10 Thread Matthias Klose
H. J. Lu writes: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > H. J. Lu writes: > > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 12:16:56AM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:01:33 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL > > > > > PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > > > >

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-29 Thread Matthieu Delahaye
> > please review the attached patch. you find the corresponding gcc > package at http://people.debian.org/~doko/gcc-ia64/ > > Matthias > FYI: Accepted: libunwind-setjmp0-dev_0.98.3-2_ia64.deb to pool/main/libu/libunwind/libunwind-setjmp0-dev_0.98.3-2_ia64.deb libunwind-setjmp0_0.98.3-

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-29 Thread Peter Chubb
> "Matthias" == Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Matthias> Matthieu Delahaye writes: >> On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 17:36, Ian Wienand wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, >> 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > ok, Ian, if >> it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which > >

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Matthieu Delahaye writes: > On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 17:36, Ian Wienand wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > ok, Ian, if it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which > > > plays well with a libgcc1 package including the libunwind7 shared > > > li

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-24 Thread Matthieu Delahaye
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 17:36, Ian Wienand wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > ok, Ian, if it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which > > plays well with a libgcc1 package including the libunwind7 shared > > libs. > > It's actually Matthieu's pa

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-24 Thread Ian Wienand
On Wed, Nov 24, 2004 at 12:46:12AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > ok, Ian, if it's ok with you, I'll prepare a libunwind upload, which > plays well with a libgcc1 package including the libunwind7 shared > libs. It's actually Matthieu's package so he needs to have the final say so; it's a "rock and

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
David Mosberger writes: > > On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:26:01 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > Matthias> From my point of view we can get around with it by > Matthias> including the libunwind shared library in libgcc1 for the > Matthias> sarge release. I'm worried

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-23 Thread David Mosberger
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 00:26:01 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Matthias> From my point of view we can get around with it by Matthias> including the libunwind shared library in libgcc1 for the Matthias> sarge release. I'm worried about the version skew of the Matt

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
David Mosberger writes: > > On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:27:52 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > Matthias> Is the patch in #278836 a prerequisite for the above > Matthias> changes, or can it be done without it? > > If the gas-patch isn't applied, you run the risk of g

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-23 Thread David Mosberger
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:27:52 +0100, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: Matthias> Is the patch in #278836 a prerequisite for the above Matthias> changes, or can it be done without it? If the gas-patch isn't applied, you run the risk of getting wrong unwind-info into object-f

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
Ian Wienand writes: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:30:38PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > > That would make sense. libstdc++5 calls _Unwind_Resume() which > > is/should be implemented by libunwind.so.7. With older versions of > > GCC, it was implemented as part of libgcc_eh.a/libgcc_s.so. > > Act

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-23 Thread Matthias Klose
H. J. Lu writes: > That is a packaging issue. You should create libgcc1_3.4.3-1_ia64.deb > which depends on libunwind7.so. libunwind7.so can come from either > Mosberger's libunwind or gcc. yes, it's a packaging issue. we currently cannot introduce new packages to the base system for sarge.

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-23 Thread H. J. Lu
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 04:31:46PM +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:30:38PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > > That would make sense. libstdc++5 calls _Unwind_Resume() which > > is/should be implemented by libunwind.so.7. With older versions of > > GCC, it was implemented as

Re: libunwind in unstable

2004-11-22 Thread Ian Wienand
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 05:30:38PM -0800, David Mosberger wrote: > That would make sense. libstdc++5 calls _Unwind_Resume() which > is/should be implemented by libunwind.so.7. With older versions of > GCC, it was implemented as part of libgcc_eh.a/libgcc_s.so. Actually, when I checked with ldd I