On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> I don't know much about the qlogicisp driver since I don't have one (I
> stick to symbios chips on my alphas since I'm VERY familiar with them from
> my API days). Is that line the memcpy line? If so, what are the details
> on the panic? Als
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Scott Venier wrote:
> any chance you have a similar patch to qlogicisp.c? I'm getting a panic
> on line 1047 (in 2.4.17's version of qlogicisp.c). Though, I also got
> that panic using gcc 2.95.2, but not using gcc 2.96 (not sure which
> particular one).
I don't know mu
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> I'm attaching a patch for the SMP problem. I think gcc is generating bad
> code, but the function that it's generating bad code for is
> unnecessary. Unfortunately, upstream kernel people never saw fit to
> accept this patch.
>
any chance you
On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Scott Venier wrote:
> That's a bit of a broad statement in the subject line, so let me clairify
> a bit. gcc 2.95.4 on alpha has some pretty nasty bugs. Because of those
> bugs, it can't build many parts of the linux kernel. Some of the problems
> are in device drivers (th
4 matches
Mail list logo
