Re: gcc armel status and armel architecture defaults

2014-01-13 Thread Riku Voipio
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:32:49AM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 05:51 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds. > For reference the logs are at: > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.9&arch

Re: gcc armel status and armel architecture defaults

2014-01-13 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 05:51 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Hi, > > the gcc-4.9 in experimental fails to build while the one for armhf succeeds. For reference the logs are at: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.9&arch=armel&ver=4.9-20140111-1&stamp=1389510444 build/genpreds -c .

Re: gcc armel status and armel architecture defaults

2014-01-12 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Are the armv4t defaults still needed, or would it be > better to default to some newer arm version like armv5t? There is one Debian derivative, QtMoko, which is one of the few usable distributions on the Openmoko Freerunner (gta02). Switch