On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:45:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Ben Collins writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build
Ben Collins writes:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
> > > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were n
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:14:50PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
> > > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sp
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
> > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors
> > from the glibc make
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
> 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors
> from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any
> problems.
>
> I notice
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
> For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
> 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors
> from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any
> problems.
Woohoo! That's good news for my
6 matches
Mail list logo
