On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 07:10 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Moving 32-bit libraries to (/usr)/lib32 won't make the amd64 port
> compliant with the FHS, which is almost impossible given the current
> setup, ie 64-bit libraries in /lib. However, it would make it compliant
> with the part of the FH
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My se
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If there's
> > consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> > /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
> My sense is that the "c
Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
If there's
consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
/emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense i
Kurt Roeckx writes:
> In the end, I'd like to get rid of ia32-libs, and have it be a
> dummy package. But on the other hand, I don't want to make a
> biarch version of things like the X libraries.
you can't get rid of it on ia64 unless you either drop the 32bit
support or else you provide a cross
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 11:10:41AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > If there's
> > consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> > /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
>
> My sense is that the
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 02:23 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> If there's
> consensus that putting this stuff in /usr/lib32 on amd64 is prettier than
> /emul/ia32-linux, I see no reason not to move forward.
My sense is that the "concensus" that exists is around FHS compliance.
While I personally consi
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The amd64 port is currently providing 32-bit libraries via the ia32-libs
> package. This package was originally designed for ia64, and thus install
> 32-bit libraries in /emul/ia32-linux/ . This is not compliant with the
> FHS for a
thanks!
Aurelien Jarno writes:
> Here is my view on the transition:
> 1) Upload of glibc with 32-bit libraries
> 2) Upload of ia32-libs without the /usr/lib32 symlink, and without the
>glibc for amd64
> 3) Upload of zlib with 32-bit libraries in /usr/lib32 instead of
>/emul/ia32-linux/
> 4
9 matches
Mail list logo
