On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 07:31:16PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > since this is my first time to get a distribution to a newer standard
> > compiler and I have no experiance with it, I want to ask, what is the
> > way to switch over to gcc-3.2?
Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm ok .. but, I thought we have a binary incompatibility, when the
> glibc is compiled with gcc-3.x? If we upload glibc build with gcc-3.x,
> this will break the whole debian-unstable, no?
The incompatibility is minor, and must be fixed before anyb
Jan,
There definitely will be an issue with rebuilding glibc against
either gcc 3.1.1 or 3.2 on at least two, if not more, arches. The
problems arise from the change in gcc 3.1 which makes libgcc symbols
.hidden now. This means that if you rebuild the current glibc
2.2.5-13 with gcc 3.1.1/3.2,
Hi ...
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 07:31:16PM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
>> A completely relaunch of debian or a slowly step step by step upload of
>> recompiled packages?
>For C++, it appears that all packages will be recompiled and uploaded
>in NMUs. For C packages, no action is needed.
Hmm ok
Jan-Hendrik Palic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> since this is my first time to get a distribution to a newer standard
> compiler and I have no experiance with it, I want to ask, what is the
> way to switch over to gcc-3.2?
>
> A completely relaunch of debian or a slowly step step by step upload o
5 matches
Mail list logo
