Processed: Re: gnat-3.15p: fails to compile polyorb

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 253865 gcc-defaults Bug#253865: gnat-3.15p: fails to compile polyorb Bug reassigned from package `gnat-4.1' to `gcc-defaults'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administr

Re: GNAT 3.15p transition plan

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > Florian, I don't agree. I understand your arguments but honestly, > there is no more than one ACT release per year. So people don't > have to often rebuilt their programs and libraries. I've looked at a few packages which would need DSOs and I came to t

Re: GNAT 3.15p transition plan

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm going to recompile the existing Ada packages in Debian using GNAT > 3.15p, at least on x86. > > This involves the following steps: > > - Packaging GNAT 3.15p (mostly done). I'm going to omit DSO support > (see below). > > - Fixing the FTBFS

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > >> Nonetheless, I suspect that the package won't build on sparc, >> since 5smastop.adb at least has disappeared in this version. >> Sam ported GNAT to sparc/linux and powerpc/linux and I have no >> idea about

Re: GNAT 3.15p

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > Nonetheless, I suspect that the package won't build on sparc, > since 5smastop.adb at least has disappeared in this version. > Sam ported GNAT to sparc/linux and powerpc/linux and I have no > idea about how he proceeded. > > Are you able to test? No, th

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: > >>> I'll check soon if I can get GNAT 3.15p to bootstrap on reasonably >>> current unstable... > >> Thanks for taking care of this. > > A preliminary 3.15p source package is now available at >

Re: GNAT 3.15p

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jérôme Marant) writes: >> I'll check soon if I can get GNAT 3.15p to bootstrap on reasonably >> current unstable... > Thanks for taking care of this. A preliminary 3.15p source package is now available at (beware, slow link). At least for

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Usually Florian keeps an open eye on gnat. AFAICR 3.14 passes an Ada >> validation suite, which 3.15 does not yet pass (please correct me if I >> am wrong). Therefore nobody packaged 3.15 yet. > > I believ

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Usually Florian keeps an open eye on gnat. AFAICR 3.14 passes an Ada > validation suite, which 3.15 does not yet pass (please correct me if I > am wrong). Therefore nobody packaged 3.15 yet. I believe that it is reasonable (even desirable) to replace 3

Re: GNAT 3.15p

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > Back from vacation ? :-) too soon :-) last week planes could'nt start due to a cyclone, but that didn't delay my return this week ;-) > > > Is anyone still working on this or should I give it a try > > > (I'm not th

Re: GNAT 3.15p

Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : Back from vacation ? :-) > > Is anyone still working on this or should I give it a try > > (I'm not the best skilled though)? > > Usually Florian keeps an open eye on gnat. AFAICR 3.14 passes an Ada > validation suite, which 3.15 does not yet pass

Re: GNAT 3.15p

=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me?= Marant writes: > > Hi, > > GNAT 3.15p has been released last November and it is still > not packaged in Debian. Since, the GNAT from GCC tree is > still not stable enough, I'd suggest that we keep on updating > the ACT public release. > > Jon Ward told he w