Re: FTBFSes with gdc and Sparc

2008-04-16 Thread Gonéri Le Bouder
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 08:01:42AM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:30:28AM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: (...) > `gdc' is a "default" and almost empty package provided by gcc-defaults, which > Depends on the default gdc version, gdc-4.1 for now. Then if you Build-Depends

Re: FTBFSes with gdc and Sparc

2008-04-15 Thread Arthur Loiret
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:30:28AM +0200, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: > > gdc is not broken on sparc, there is just no D runtime lib on sparc yet. > gdc on sparc has a different behaviour and doesn't react as expect for > most of the users. Having a build dependency on it is a problem. For the > moment

Re: FTBFSes with gdc and Sparc

2008-04-15 Thread Gonéri Le Bouder
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 12:02:56AM +0200, Arthur Loiret wrote: Thank you Arthur for this fast reply. > gdc is not broken on sparc, there is just no D runtime lib on sparc yet. gdc on sparc has a different behaviour and doesn't react as expect for most of the users. Having a build dependency on it

Re: FTBFSes with gdc and Sparc

2008-04-15 Thread Arthur Loiret
reopen 461101 reassign 461101 gcc-defaults found 461101 1.69 retitle 461101 gdc should not be built on sparc severity 461101 normal merge 461101 475857 475863 475864 475865 475866 475867 475869 thanks gdc is not broken on sparc, there is just no D runtime lib on sparc yet. gdc-4.1 and gdc-4.2 wil

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Processed: Re: FTBFSes with gdc and Sparc

2008-04-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > unarchive 461101 Unarchived Bug 461101 > reopen 461101 Bug#461101: gdc: module stdio cannot read file 'std/stdio.d' Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reassign 461101 gcc-defaults Bug#461101: gdc: module stdio cannot read file 'std/stdio.d' Bug r