Re: Bug#126125: gcc: Hardly any cross-compilers available

2002-01-03 Thread Matthias Klose
Phil Edwards writes: > > Something that just came up last week: it might be nice to have a toolchain > targeting the win32 platform. The few times I've needed to build a .exe > from a linux box were memorable experiences due to the hoop-jumping required. > (I suspect it's much easier now.) > >

Re: Bug#126125: gcc: Hardly any cross-compilers available

2002-01-02 Thread Phil Edwards
Something that just came up last week: it might be nice to have a toolchain targeting the win32 platform. The few times I've needed to build a .exe from a linux box were memorable experiences due to the hoop-jumping required. (I suspect it's much easier now.) Users wondering "how well would suc

Re: Bug#126125: gcc: Hardly any cross-compilers available

2001-12-21 Thread Phil Edwards
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:08:25PM +0100, Martin v. Loewis wrote: > > It would be nice to have more cross-compilers available, > > so that it can become possible cross-compile programs for other > > platforms. Cross-compilers should at least be available for all > > platforms that are supported b

Re: Bug#126125: gcc: Hardly any cross-compilers available

2001-12-21 Thread Martin v. Loewis
> It would be nice to have more cross-compilers available, > so that it can become possible cross-compile programs for other > platforms. Cross-compilers should at least be available for all > platforms that are supported by Linux. Notice that much more is necessary for cross-compilation than ju