Your message dated Thu, 29 Aug 2024 10:16:59 +0200
with message-id <37428fa7-9627-4926-8948-0b28d63c7...@debian.org>
and subject line fixed in 14.2.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1077763,
regarding gcc-14: An alignment request might be added before endbr on function
entry.
to be mar
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR116174
Bug #1077763 [gcc-14] gcc-14: An alignment request might be added before endbr
on function entry.
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://gcc.gnu.org/PR116174'.
--
1077763: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/
Package: gcc-14
Version: 14.1.0-5
Severity: important
Control: forwarded -1 https://gcc.gnu.org/PR116174
gcc-14 may add an alignment requesst before endbr with
-fcf-protection=branch -O2. Upstream report has a testcase. This is just
for tracking.
Sebastian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unarchive 984456
Bug #984456 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[ftp.debian.org] RM: gcc-cross-support/experimental -- ROM; implemented by
gcc-defaults
Unarchived Bug 984456
> forcemerge 984456 989686
Bug #984456 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[ftp.debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 932548 932546
Bug #932548 [g++-8] g++-8: g++ fails to compile C++17 programs that use
std::filesystem::directory_iterator
Bug #932546 [g++-8] g++-8 fails to build C++17 programs that use std::filesystem
Merged 932546 932548
> thank you
Stop
On 2013-10-25 13:13, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is my understanding that the GCC maintainers had a number of concerns
> with various ports (or architecture specific issues related to gcc).
> Please forward a list of the issues/bugs (be it Debian or upstream ones)
> that requires help from p
Hi,
It is my understanding that the GCC maintainers had a number of concerns
with various ports (or architecture specific issues related to gcc).
Please forward a list of the issues/bugs (be it Debian or upstream ones)
that requires help from porters to solve to debian-rele...@lists.debian.org.
~
Dear all,
I just packaged gcc-4.8-doc [1], and uploaded to vasks [2]. It's based
on gcc-4.7-doc, with some small changes on patches. Please review, and,
if it's good enough, upload it for me.
Many thanks and greetings,
GUO Yixuan
[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/yixuan-guest/gcc-do
Your message dated Wed, 30 May 2012 10:27:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#674991: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #519562,
regarding A -help request is not an error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:02:13 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Closing obsolete/orphan bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #631727,
regarding gdc: Request to package D2 front end for gcc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
gdc-4.6 has now been uploaded to unstable, and is built with the D2 frontend.
Regards
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Package: gdc
Severity: wishlist
Please consider packaging the D2 front end build of gdc.
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.38-2-amd64
Your message dated
with message-id <20100713184531.10815.63133.mass-bugs-cl...@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line gcj-4.3 removed from Debian unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #519562,
regarding A -help request is not an error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Package: gij-4.3
Version: 4.3.3-3
Severity: minor
File: /usr/bin/gkeytool-4.3
Hi,
keytool should not return an exit code indicating an error while asked
for help.
% keytool -help >/dev/null; echo $?
1
BTW: Why keytool prints an empty line to stderr, as you can see above?
Bye, Jörg.
-- System
Hello GCC and mips* folks,
Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> I find it hard to believe, but it seems that the SIN() and COS()
> built-ins might be broken in gfortran on mipsel.
[snip]
Here's an update on this, in case anyone was wondering.
Thiemo very kindly gave me an account on a mips machine, where
Dear list,
I find it hard to believe, but it seems that the SIN() and COS()
built-ins might be broken in gfortran on mipsel. See this build log for
instance, search in it for the string "Testing Routine B101" and look at
the table following that string:
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=ce
matically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:24:47 +0200
Source: gcc-4.1
Binary: gcc-4.1-soft-float libstdc++6-4.1
matically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:24:47 +0200
Source: gcc-4.1
Binary: gcc-4.1-soft-float libstdc++6-4.1
Dear devolepers,
i'm writing a little program which translates music into images.
I wrote the two procedures and i want them to comunicate between themselves. A
friend suggest me to use the functions SendMessage() and PeekMessage() , i want
some help about their syntax and semantycs. What kind of
ackage: gcc-3.3
Version: 3.3.6-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
GCC Team,
Hello from the Debian Java Team! As part of a request to update the
source package for antlr, I noticed that its last upload was staying out
of testing for 120+ days, apparently because of dependency failure. One
key depende
Hi,
Please subscribe me for this mailing list
Thanks.
Rama
Hi all,
You're receiving this message as the maintainer of one or more packages
which are related to libgmp3c2, directly or indirectly, and therefore
need to be updated in testing together as a group. We believe that with
a little nudging, glibc 2.3.5-6 will be ready to go into testing
tomorrow,
Euh Nor reply ? I did send a reply.
Check below transcript
On Monday 27 June 2005 23:48, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> #307868: gcc-3.3: request for additional link in /usr/lib/gcc-lib,
> which was filed against th
Your message dated Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:36:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#307868: gcc-3.3: request for additional link in
/usr/lib/gcc-lib
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sun, 22 May 2005 13:08:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295326: gcc-3.3: Request the ability to write a static
library archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
> /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.6/include/stddef.h
>
> thie 3.3.6 is annoying since it changes with every (minor) upgrade
> of the compiler.
>
> Hence request to add a link to the package
>
> ln /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.6 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3
>
&
annoying since it changes with every (minor) upgrade
of the compiler.
Hence request to add a link to the package
ln /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3.6 /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-linux/3.3
This way for each minor upgrade, the directory no longer changes
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT
On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 12:29:10AM +0100, Falk Hueffner wrote:
> Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'd love to be able to create a static library archive with a
> > command like gcc -o libfoo.a -c {a,b,c,d}.c.
>
> Why? What would be the advantage over using ar rc?
gcc acts as a fron
Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd love to be able to create a static library archive with a
> command like gcc -o libfoo.a -c {a,b,c,d}.c.
Why? What would be the advantage over using ar rc?
--
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 1:3.3.5-8
Severity: wishlist
I'd love to be able to create a static library archive with a command
like gcc -o libfoo.a -c {a,b,c,d}.c.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[please don't post Debian specific packaging problems to the upstream
developers]
please have a look at the gfortran-4.0 package in the experimental
distribution; the gcc-snapshot package will be updated later.
Matthias
Kamaraju Kusumanchi writes:
> Hi all
> Apologies for the cross posti
Hi all
Apologies for the cross posting. But I think the issue is relevant to
all the addresses included.
I am a fortran programmer and would really like to see gfortran in
gcc-snapshot package. I searched through the bug reports and found
that
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2846
ation); Wed, 27 Oct 2004
19:44:46 +0200
From: "Laurent Bonnaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libstdc++6-4.0-doc: bad RO
Package: libstdc++6-4.0-doc
Version: 4.0-0pre0
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
here is the problem:
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/std::ofstream.3.gz: bad symlink or ROFF
`.so' request
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3/std::basic_ofstream.3: No such file or
direc
A p proval Letter
Sheldon
Trusted Bank Group
Ref: 03163
Sir:
this letter is to confirm that you have been a.pproved
to ref i nance for a
conventional mor t gage at 3.75% pending completion
of your application.
We have verified that you fit our mor t gage guidelines
to qualify for our low
`.so' request
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3/std::basic_streambuf.3: No such file or
directory
mandb: warning: /usr/share/man/man3/std::streambuf.3.gz: bad symlink or ROFF
`.so' request
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3/std::basic_ostream.3: No such file or
direc
Hello,
Resently we sent you an email about mor
t g age r at e going up, just from
last week that ra t e
s went up by 2 point. Its not to
late to lock yourmor tg age r at
e. You can qualifiy to get a
400, 000 at 400 a month. But
please
act fast as the ra
tes will not stay low for
with ESMTP id i586K3mU002288
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:20:06 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: debian-gcc@lists.debian.org
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Request
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:20:11 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 213994 233208
Bug#213994: gcc-3.3: Please provide an overflow protection in the stock compiler
Bug#233208: Request for stack protector enabled by default
Merged 213994 233208.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
merge 213994 233208
thanks
Thomas Sjögren writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: 3.3.3-0pre4
> Priority: wishlist
>
> As Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a and David Alan Gilbert mentions in
> #213994 [1] it would be a good thing if the SSP patch i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: 3.3.3-0pre4
Priority: wishlist
As Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a and David Alan Gilbert mentions in
#213994 [1] it would be a good thing if the SSP patch in the GCC-package
would be enabled by default. This would, hopefully,
11:08:22 -
Received: from thomas by balrog with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AmWVd-00020d-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:08:25 +0100
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 12:08:25 +0100
From: Thomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROT
Package: gcc
Version: 3.3
The SSP patch in the Debian GCC package was included in august 2003, a
month later the "-fstack-protector-all" option was introduced by Hiroaki
Etoh and in december 2003 another version available, fixing various bugs.
I hope you include the lastest version of the SSP pa
Thank you for your interest in Excelsior Designs furniture. Your request for
additional information will be personally responded to as quickly as possible.
A store that carries the Excelsior collection in the area where you reside will
be provided along with their address and telephone
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 07:06:42AM +0200, Martin v. L?wis wrote:
> Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > int foo(int *x, int *y)
> > > {
> > > return x - y;
> > > }
> >
> > There is no conversion to int. foo* may be subtracted from foo* for any
> > type foo. It's normal pointer
32-bit ints, there may be an
overflow when converting ptrdiff_t to int.
Importantly, however, this feature request is unnecessary. The desired
feature already exists. See the documentation of the -Wconversion flag.
--Greg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin v. Löwis) writes:
> No. In that case, ptrdiff_t most likely would be an integral type with
> 42.69 bits, and conversion to int would cause loss of
> precision. Matteo requests that a warning is issued for size kind of
> conversion (probably also from size_t to int), as on
Phil Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > int foo(int *x, int *y)
> > {
> > return x - y;
> > }
>
> There is no conversion to int. foo* may be subtracted from foo* for any
> type foo. It's normal pointer arithmetic. This code is fine.
You are missing the point. The result of the subtr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] removed; no bug was added to the gcc database,
since the email was malformed]
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 10:32:09PM -0400, Matteo Frigo wrote:
> >Description:
>
> It would be nice if this function issued a warning because of the
> implicit conversion ptrdiff_t -> int:
>
> int foo(
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Matteo Frigo
>Organization: lost during childhood
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Feature request: gcc should warn upon conversions ptrdiff_t ->
>int
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class
hi,
i've read the web page about how to upgrade to the 3.3 via cvs.
did that, it worked fine, ( i think).
i'm looking for a web page that shows what to do afterwards in order to
finish the upgrade process.
regards,
michael
tter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: automatic dependency dehairification request
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Package: gcc
Version: 2.7.2.
DEAR FRIEND,
I AM MR. BARRY WILLIAM, THE CO-ORDINATOR EASTERN ZONE OF (YEAA) AN
ORGANISATION SET UP BY LATE HEAD OF STATE GENERAL SANNI ABACHA TO HELP
TRANSFORM HIMSELF FROM MILITARY HEAD OF STATE TO CIVILIAN PRESIDENT DURING THE
1998 ELECTION IN NIGERIA WHICH DID NOT HOLD BECAUSE OF THE SUDD
Hello,
Could you please direct this request to the proper party or department? We
would like to get some additional information about your business in an effort
to explore the ways that we might be able to work together. If possible, we
would like to receive your media package. If you have an
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator:Matthias Klose
>Organization:
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis:
>Severity:
>Priority:
>Category: send-pr
>Class:
>Release: 3.0 (Debian) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
System: Linux gate.local 2.4.4-ac15 #1 Fri May 25 00:52
55 matches
Mail list logo
