Bug#317268: marked as done (g++-4.0: Assembler problem with g++-4.0)

2005-07-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:39:00 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#317268: g++-4.0: Assembler problem with g++-3.4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#317268: g++-4.0: Assembler problem with g++-3.4

2005-07-12 Thread Matthias Klose
fixed with binutils-2.16.1 Yannick Beynet writes: > Package: g++-4.0 > Version: 4.0.0-12 > Severity: important > > When I Try to compile with g++-4.0 I have some assembler messages like > this : > tmp/cceXLCbg.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp/cceXLCbg.s:615: Warning: ignoring changed section attribu

Processed: retitle 317268 to g++-4.0: Assembler problem with g++-4.0

2005-07-08 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14 > retitle 317268 g++-4.0: Assembler problem with g++-4.0 Bug#317268: g++-4.0: Assembler problem with g++-3.4 Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here

Bug#317268: g++-4.0: Assembler problem with g++-3.4

2005-07-07 Thread Yannick Beynet
Package: g++-4.0 Version: 4.0.0-12 Severity: important When I Try to compile with g++-4.0 I have some assembler messages like this : tmp/cceXLCbg.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cceXLCbg.s:615: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .gnu.linkonce.t._ZNSt12_Vector_baseISsSaISsEED2Ev /tmp/cceX

Re: Problem with g++ ( solved )

2002-06-12 Thread Martin v. Loewis
"Kapil Khosla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess by reading the man page I have understood that g++ is just > a script which calls gcc compiler with options to recognize C++. That is not true (anymore); it is now a proper binary. Regards, Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Problem with g++

2002-06-12 Thread Martin v. Loewis
"Kapil Khosla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I thought g++ was the C++ compiler , why do I have to upgrade gcc to > make it work. What really is g++ ? It is the C++ compiler driver (just like gcc is the C compiler driver). The C++ compiler proper is cc1plus (like cc1 for C). Regards, Martin --

Problem with g++ ( solved )

2002-06-12 Thread Kapil Khosla
I guess by reading the man page I have understood that g++ is just a script which calls gcc compiler with options to recognize C++. Thanks for your help. Kapil -- On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:33:07 Kapil Khosla wrote: > Thanks again >I just solved the problem using your mail . I saw that my gcc ver

Re: Problem with g++

2002-06-12 Thread Kapil Khosla
Thanks again I just solved the problem using your mail . I saw that my gcc version was 2.95.3 I upgraded to 2.95.4 and now g++ works fine. I thought g++ was the C++ compiler , why do I have to upgrade gcc to make it work. What really is g++ ? Thanks a lot, Kapil -- On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:23:0

Re: Problem with g++

2002-06-12 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:28:15 -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote: > dpkg -l g++-2.95 > > ii g++-2.95 2.95.4-7 The GNU C++ compiler. > > dpkg -l binutils > ii binutils 2.12.90.0.1-4 The GNU assembler, linker and binary > utilitils OK, those are the current versions for woody. (Ass

Re: Problem with g++

2002-06-12 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 21:53:15 -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote: > I did an apt-get install g++-2.95 and am having problems using my C++ > compiler. Are you running testing or unstable? What is the version number of the g++-2.95 you installed ("dpkg -l g++-2.95")? > I get the error message > as: unre

Problem with g++

2002-06-11 Thread Kapil Khosla
Hi, I did an apt-get install g++-2.95 and am having problems using my C++ compiler. I get the error message as: unrecognized option `-Qy' I am able to generate the assembly file by doing g++ -S test.c but not able to generate the executable. I have also tried g++-3.0 and get the same error, Plea

problem with g++ 2.9

2002-03-05 Thread a
in my c++ program i write: XtAddCallback(entry, XtNcallback, print_string, "one"); g++ 2.9 complains: xzip.cpp: In function `int main(int, char **)': xzip.cpp:35: passing `const char *' as argument 4 of `XtAddCallback(_WidgetRec *, const char *, void (*)(_WidgetRec *, void *, void *), void *)' d

Re: libstdc++ linking problem with g++3.0

2001-10-12 Thread Alexei Khlebnikov
Zoltan Nagy wrote: > When I use the g++-3.0 ( gcc version 3.0.2 20010922 (Debian prerelease) > ) the compiler doesn't link the libstdc++. It might be a bug. Firstly, the compiler does not link at all. It is linker's task. Secondly, the linker links it [libstdc++] fine for me (g++ is the same vers

libstdc++ linking problem with g++3.0

2001-10-11 Thread Zoltan Nagy
Hi, When I use the g++-3.0 ( gcc version 3.0.2 20010922 (Debian prerelease) ) the compiler doesn't link the libstdc++. It might be a bug. Zoltan