> Yes. Not only has the libstdc++ ABI changed, but the symbol mangling has
> as well (hence most of the undefined symbols that you're seeing). I've
> tested gcc/g++ 3.0 out on KDE on Alpha before and it worked fairly
> well. There were some problems (Konqueror crashed for no reason, etc),
> but
On 2 Nov 2001, Brian Nelson wrote:
> I've been trying out gcc-3.0 (3.0.2) with some little Qt apps that I
> wrote. The code compiles fine, but fails with tons of undefined
> references Qwhatever objects when trying to link.
>
> All is well, however, when linking with 2.95.4.
>
> What's the pro
I've been trying out gcc-3.0 (3.0.2) with some little Qt apps that I
wrote. The code compiles fine, but fails with tons of undefined
references Qwhatever objects when trying to link.
All is well, however, when linking with 2.95.4.
What's the problem? Do I need to rebuild the qt libs with 3.0 to
3 matches
Mail list logo
