Dear Experts,
Can anyone suggest the best approach to installing a
newer gcc on an older Debian system?
Specifically, I have an Nvidia Jetson developer board which
is running buster, and cannot easily be upgraded because of
the non-free Nvidia stuff. But I'd like to install a newer
g++ in
Your message dated Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:12:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#909112: fixed in isl 0.21-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #909112,
regarding isl FTCBFS: installing python3 for a foreign architecture fails
postinst
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Source: isl
Version: 0.20-2
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
isl fails to cross build from source, because installing its
Build-Depends fails in python3.6-minimal's postinst. Actually, isl does
not need the host architecture python. The build architecture python is
Your message dated Wed, 07 Feb 2018 18:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#889711: fixed in mpfr4 4.0.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #889711,
regarding Error installing libmpfr-doc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
gs: upstream
>
> When installing libmpfr-doc you get this error:
Only when the doc-base package is installed.
> Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/mpfr-manual', line 12: value of `Format' not
> specified.
> Note: `install-docs --verbose --check file_name' may give more det
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 - upstream
Bug #889711 [libmpfr-doc] Error installing libmpfr-doc
Removed tag(s) upstream.
--
889711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=889711
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: libmpfr-doc
Version: 4.0.1~rc2-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
When installing libmpfr-doc you get this error:
Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/mpfr-manual', line 12: value of `Format' not
specified.
Note: `install-docs --verbose --check file_name' may give more details
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2017 21:20:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#851273: fixed in gcc-6 6.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #851273,
regarding libstdc++-6-dev: error when installing together with
libstdc++-6-dev:armel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: libstdc++-6-dev
Version: 6.3.0-1
Severity: important
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
An attempt at installing libstdc++-6-dev:armel fails:
| # apt-get -y install libstdc++-6-dev libstdc++-6-dev:armel
| ...
| dpkg: error processing archive
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-N1eyfh/12
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:50:59 +0200
with message-id <539850b3.2040...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#751251: gfortran: please file a bunch of "heads-up"
bugs to library packages installing mod files
has caused the Debian Bug report #751251,
regarding gfortra
Package: gfortran
Version: 4:4.9.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
with version 1.128 of gcc-defaults, gfortran now defaults to 4.9, which
has a different mod file version. Library packages with fortran 90
interfaces will all need to be recompiled for their mod files to be
compatible with
Dear Amir,
On 11 September 2013 22:27, Amir Omidvari wrote:
> Hi,
> My name is Amir, I am student of computer science at California State
> University Fullerton. I am totally new to Linux systems and I just installed
> xubuntu on my pc. I wanted to install eclipse for programmign in c/c++ and I
>
Hi,
My name is Amir, I am student of computer science at California State
University Fullerton. I am totally new to Linux systems and I just installed
xubuntu on my pc. I wanted to install eclipse for programmign in c/c++ and I
have to install g++ 4.7.0.3 first. I couldn`t find this version in u
r when installing in a
buildd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea wha
Gustavo Noronha Silva schrieb:
> Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
> Version: 1.0.80-5
> Severity: important
>
> Installing this package in an otherwise clean environment (used as a
> buildd), I get the following:
>
> Setting up java-gcj-compat-dev (1.0.80-5) ...
>
Package: java-gcj-compat-dev
Version: 1.0.80-5
Severity: important
Installing this package in an otherwise clean environment (used as a
buildd), I get the following:
Setting up java-gcj-compat-dev (1.0.80-5) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative path
/usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/jarsigner
Package: libgcj7-dev
Version: 4.1.1-20
I have noticed that libgcj7-dev is saving the Java developmental files
into the C++ include folder.
Here is a list of examples of where they are being stored:
$ ls /usr/include/c++/4.1.2/java
applet awt beans io lang math net nio rmi security sql
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 447212 apt
Bug#447212: libgcj-doc: Uses lots of additional disk space when installing
Bug reassigned from package `libgcj-doc' to `apt'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
reassign 447212 apt
thanks
not an issue with libgcj-doc itself; with your reasoning you could
file a bug report for every package.
Witold Baryluk writes:
> Package: libgcj-doc
> Version: 4.2.2-3
> Severity: minor
>
> libgcj-doc is big, and when using apt for install/upgrade
> it says that will u
Package: libgcj-doc
Version: 4.2.2-3
Severity: minor
libgcj-doc is big, and when using apt for install/upgrade
it says that will use about 300MB of hard disk space,
(or only few MB if upgrading). But if i have previous version
of libgcj-doc, 50MB of free disk space, and apt says that
10MB of addit
> a buildd problem, not a package problem; will be fixed tonight.
has this been fixed and if so has the guifrications build been requeued?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 6 Oct 2006 19:06:10 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#391410: guifrications ftbfs on powerpc buildd because of
problem installing gij
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem ha
This one time, at band camp, peter green said:
> i belive the soloution is to make gij-4.1 pre-depend on libgcj7-0
Surely a simple Depends should do the trick? Is the problem just
shlibdeps aren't properly calaculated?
--
-
| ,''
> This one time, at band camp, peter green said:
> > i belive the soloution is to make gij-4.1 pre-depend on libgcj7-0
> Surely a simple Depends should do the trick?
according to http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/gij-4.1 a depends is
already there.
i thought pre-depends was needed to gaur
package: gij-4.1
severity: grave
the buildd log in question is at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=guifications&ver=2.13%7Ebeta3-0.1&ar
ch=powerpc&stamp=1159970889&file=log&as=raw, the following is an extract
from that log
Setting up gij-4.1 (4.1.1-15) ...
gcj-dbtool-4.1: error while loadi
Package: g77-3.4
Version: 3.4.6-4
Severity: normal
I got this message when trying to upgrage the package:
Setting up g77 (3.4.6-13) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/g77.postinst: line 12: /usr/share/man/man1/g77.1.gz: No such
file or directory
dpkg: error processing g77 (--configure):
subprocess post-ins
Your message dated Sun, 13 Aug 2006 23:37:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373143: errors when installing gpc-2.1-4.1-doc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Your message dated Sat, 8 Jul 2006 16:35:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fastjar - error when installing the package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: gpc-2.1-4.1-doc
Version: 4.1.1-3
Severity: normal
When installing, I get the following error:
Setting up gpc-2.1-4.1-doc (4.1.1-3) ...
warning: file `/usr/share/info/gpc-2.1-4.1.info.gz' does not exist at
/usr/sbin/install-docs line 718,
line 15.
warning: file mask `/usr/share
unreproducible. does /usr/share/info/dir exist? If yes, pleae recheck
with debian-only apt resources.
Jan Staniek writes:
> Package: fastjar
> Version: 1:4.1.0-4
>
> Hello,
> when I upgraded some days ago my system (debian-testing) apt-get reported an
> error while inst
Package: fastjar
Version: 1:4.1.0-4
Hello,
when I upgraded some days ago my system (debian-testing) apt-get reported an
error while installing the package fastjar.
Here is the installation report:
johnny-mobile:/home/johnny# apt-get dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building
tent-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc-4.0-base: Not installing changelog.Debian properly
Message-ID: &l
Hi!
On 1/6/06, Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm unable to reproduce that. please could you send the log of your
> upgrade?
I think that I've found the problem:
Install happens in this way:
Preparing to replace cpp-4.0 4.0.2-5 (using cpp-4.0_4.0.2-6_i386.deb) ...
Unpacking replace
tags 346171 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
I'm unable to reproduce that. please could you send the log of your
upgrade?
Nelson A. de Oliveira writes:
> Package: gcc-4.0-base
> Version: 4.0.2-6
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Non native packages must provide changelog.Debian (section
> 12.
Package: gcc-4.0-base
Version: 4.0.2-6
Severity: serious
Justification: Non native packages must provide changelog.Debian (section 12.7)
Hi!
Today, after upgrading the packages cpp-4.0 g++-4.0 gcc-4.0 gcc-4.0-base
from version 4.0.2-5 to 4.0.2-6, I saw that there was no
changelog.Debian.gz file o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
> I want to install ZOPE server on my debian OP. Since the CMS that I want to
> use requires the ZOPE VERSION 2.7.5 I cannot use the "apt-get install Zope" -
> method because it is always version 2.6 installed.
> That is why I think that I will have to install ZOP
I want to install ZOPE server on my debian OP. Since the CMS that I want to use
requires the ZOPE VERSION 2.7.5 I cannot use the "apt-get install Zope" -
method because it is always version 2.6 installed.
That is why I think that I will have to install ZOPE from sources - is this
true?
When
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:38:59 +0300
Received: from markuskj by lappa with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17YXP4-00035X-00; Sat, 27 Jul 2002 22:39:02 +0300
Subject: g++-3.0: c++ symlink and alternatives are not c
Dear sirs,
I have a question on the titled installation.
I have successfully installed debian 2.2.20 on
sparc10 and am now installing the packages one by one from the breakdown of
the
.iso image binary-sparc-1.iso (debian
2.2 rev7 at fifi.org).
All I could see are the debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 154525 gcc
Bug#154525: g++-3.0: c++ symlink and alternatives are not created when
installing
Bug reassigned from package `g++-3.0' to `gcc'.
> severity 154525 wishlist
Bug#154525: g++-3.0: c++ symlink and alternatives are
hen configuring/compiling a package
- make ~/bin/gcc a symlink to gcc-3.0 and add it to your path
Markus Järvinen writes:
> Package: g++-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.4-12
> Severity: normal
>
> Alternatives for /usr/bin/c++ are not created/updated when installing g++-3.0.
>
> --
Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.4-12
Severity: normal
Alternatives for /usr/bin/c++ are not created/updated when installing g++-3.0.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lappa 2.2.20 #1 Sat Apr 20 11:45:28 EST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions
Hi,
Recently I ran into
a problem in postinstallation stage when installing gij_3.0.4-6
It has a \\ in line
5 of postinst script, which causes update-alternatives to fail.
It should be changed
to \
--
Omer Mussaev
Software Developer
Mercury Interactive / Topaz Prism R&D
Applica
Matthias> Yes, can be done by moving the libstdc++ headers to
Matthias> /usr/include/g++-v3-3.1 or something like this. Do we want to
Matthias> do this?
You are the final judge, but I think this would be a very nice Debian
feature.
--
Laurent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
Yes, can be done by moving the libstdc++ headers to
/usr/include/g++-v3-3.1 or something like this. Do we want to do this?
Same thing with libgcj-dev, but that's not as easy as setting
gxx-include-dir to the right path ...
Laurent Bonnaud writes:
>
> Currently, packages g++-3.0 and g++-3.1 canno
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 135305 normal
Bug#135305: gcc-doc: Installing gcc-doc removes g++, gcc, etc
Severity set to `normal'.
> reassign 135305 ftp.debian.org
Bug#135305: gcc-doc: Installing gcc-doc removes g++, gcc, etc
Bug reassigned from package `
severity 135305 normal
reassign 135305 ftp.debian.org
retitle 135305 Please remove "gcc" source package and associated -doc binary
packages from testing
thanks
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:16:13 +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> So I guess the right thing to do would be to reassign this bug to
>
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:57:53 +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> The real bug seems to be that gcc-doc, g77-doc, gpc-doc and cpp-doc are
> still available in testing - AFAICT the should be removed from testing.
> (The problem does not occur with sid, as these packages are no longer
> available
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 04:48:03 +0100, Erik Warendorph wrote:
> # apt-get -uyds install gcc-doc
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be REMOVED:
> g++ g++-2.95 gcc gcc-2.95 libstdc++2.10-dev task-c++-dev
> The following NEW
Package: gcc-doc
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-23
Severity: important
I've just dist-upgraded from debian 2.2 (stable "potato") to
debian 3.0 (testing "woody").
When i try to install gcc-doc (I think it was uninstalled during
the dist-upgrade), apt-get wants to remove g++, gcc and several
other
Title: RE: Installing
Matthias,
Silly Me, I sent it as HTML again :(.
See my comments below
Original Message-
From: Matthias Klose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sonntag, 3. Februar 2002 17:23
To: Dupont, Michael
Cc: Debian GCC maintainers
Subject: Re: Installing
Title: RE: Installing
Matthias,
Sorry about the HTML mail, I will send ascii in the future. :(
The release that I would like to patch are the 3.0.X releases from GCC,
currently I am testing with 3.0.3, but 3.0.4 is out already.
>>it's an (unpublished) script, which create
>
>
>
>
>
> Installing
>
>
>
> Dear Debian Developers,
>
>
> A while ago I was asking about the standard build procedures
> for the GCC under debian.
>
>
> Right now I have been compiling from CVS under POTATO, am
> working on the
Title: Installing
Dear Debian Developers,
A while ago I was asking about the standard build procedures for the GCC under debian.
Right now I have been compiling from CVS under POTATO, am working on the 3.0.3.
What are the procedures for creating a DEB from the CVS, how do you update
Alexander Schreiber writes:
> Hi!
>
> Looks like there are b0rken dependencies around the GNU Pascal Compiler
> in Debian woody. The packages gpc and gpc-doc are mutually exclusive -
> installing one will uninstall the other because they are marked as
> conflicting in t
Hi!
Looks like there are b0rken dependencies around the GNU Pascal Compiler
in Debian woody. The packages gpc and gpc-doc are mutually exclusive -
installing one will uninstall the other because they are marked as
conflicting in their control files.
Is there any reason for this? It certainly
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:57:43PM -0500, Faheem Mitha wrote:
>
> Dear Gcc People,
>
> The following item appears in the changelog.
>
> gcc (2.95.2-16) unstable; urgency=low
>
> * debian/control.in: Add awk to Build-Depends.
> Tighten libc6-dev dependency for libstdc++-dev (fixes #73031,
Dear Gcc People,
The following item appears in the changelog.
gcc (2.95.2-16) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/control.in: Add awk to Build-Depends.
Tighten libc6-dev dependency for libstdc++-dev (fixes #73031,
#72531, #72534).
I am trying to compile the gcc-2.95 (2.95.4.ds6) package f
58 matches
Mail list logo
