Matthias Klose wrote:
anyway, please build the
gcc-3.4 package from experimental for a comparision.
Alex Perry wrote:
> Good idea. In progress.
> I note in passing that some of the patches have rejects.
$ grep unexpected gcc-3.4.log
# of unexpected failures8
# of unexpected successes
Matthias Klose wrote:
Alex Perry writes:
Attached message is my most recent posting to the AMD64 porting
list. GCC appears to build successfully, but checks fail as shown
in the attachment.
"fails"? the test results look pretty good.
I was assuming that this aspect of the test result was a
Alex Perry writes:
> I would appreciate any suggestions for this oddity ... please ...
>
> Attached message is my most recent posting to the AMD64 porting
> list. GCC appears to build successfully, but checks fail as shown
> in the attachment.
"fails"? the test results look pretty good. anyway,
I would appreciate any suggestions for this oddity ... please ...
Attached message is my most recent posting to the AMD64 porting list.
GCC appears to build successfully, but checks fail as shown in the
attachment.
If someone would like the full 6MB (uncompressed) build log, let me know.
Any othe
4 matches
Mail list logo