On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 09:51:07AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> Btw, I have been told, that an upload to "testing unstable" doesn't
> work. Uploads that should go to testing should simply have a higher
> priority. Correct?
Well, it will get to testing within 10 days, normally. A higher priori
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:30:06PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > I've added the patch from Franz to the 2.95 CVS. This is required for
> > glibc to be buildable again.
> >
> > Matthias, can you do a release of gcc-2.95 with this patch, or
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I would prepare a new release on this Saturday.
Ok. I'll see if I can get a new upload by Friday night :-)
> Btw, I have been told, that an upload to "testing unstable" doesn't
> work. Uploads that should go to testing should simply have a higher
> p
Christopher C. Chimelis writes:
>
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > I've added the patch from Franz to the 2.95 CVS. This is required for
> > glibc to be buildable again.
as I understand, this patch is applied upstream as well.
> > Matthias, can you do a release of gcc-2.95
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
> I've added the patch from Franz to the 2.95 CVS. This is required for
> glibc to be buildable again.
>
> Matthias, can you do a release of gcc-2.95 with this patch, or should I?
> I can do native builds for i386, ppc, sparc, arm and mips. It'll
> take a
I've added the patch from Franz to the 2.95 CVS. This is required for
glibc to be buildable again.
Matthias, can you do a release of gcc-2.95 with this patch, or should I?
I can do native builds for i386, ppc, sparc, arm and mips. It'll
take a few days to complete, but I can do the glibc upload al
6 matches
Mail list logo
