Hey Aurelien,
On 2023-12-05 08:32, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> What about the patch below, it basically just change the compiler to
> always enable -mbranch-protection=standard, and it's also used for the
> configure script.
> --- glibc-2.37/debian/sysdeps/arm64.mk
> +++ glibc-2.37/debian/sysdeps/arm
Hi Emanuele,
On 2023-12-04 16:13, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> Hello Aurelien,
>
> On 2023-12-03 01:08, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On 2023-11-29 09:56, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > > To add BTI to the NOTE section of the above, we would need to build both
> > > GCC and glibc with -mbranch-protection=stand
Hello Aurelien,
On 2023-12-03 01:08, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2023-11-29 09:56, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> > To add BTI to the NOTE section of the above, we would need to build both
> > GCC and glibc with -mbranch-protection=standard. For gcc-13 I have
> > proposed https://bugs.debian.org/1055711.
Hi Emanuele,
On 2023-11-29 09:56, Emanuele Rocca wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to ask for suggestions about the best way to enable PAC/BTI
> support in glibc and GCC on Debian.
>
> PAC and BTI are two useful Arm security features, see this recent
> presentation at the Mini Debconf for all detail
Hi!
I would like to ask for suggestions about the best way to enable PAC/BTI
support in glibc and GCC on Debian.
PAC and BTI are two useful Arm security features, see this recent
presentation at the Mini Debconf for all details: [0]
In order to properly support PAC/BTI in Debian we need to enabl
5 matches
Mail list logo
