Re: Depencencies of gcc on glibc/eglibc and libc6-i386

2009-09-07 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Selon Aurelien Jarno: >> But in a machine with glibc 2.5 and libc6-i386 2.5 that builds gcc >> produces binary packages that are uninstallable on the same machine >> because they conflict with glibc (<< 2.9-22). Is that intentional? To >> me it seems to break the Law of Least Astonishment; if I b

Re: Depencencies of gcc on glibc/eglibc and libc6-i386

2009-09-07 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Ludovic Brenta a écrit : > Matthias Klose writes: >> On 29.08.2009 18:38, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >>> I would like to better understand the depencencies between the various >>> gcc packages and libc6{,-i386}, in particular as they relate to the >>> transition to /lib32. >>> >>> In debian/rules.conf

Re: Depencencies of gcc on glibc/eglibc and libc6-i386

2009-08-30 Thread Ludovic Brenta
Matthias Klose writes: > On 29.08.2009 18:38, Ludovic Brenta wrote: >> I would like to better understand the depencencies between the various >> gcc packages and libc6{,-i386}, in particular as they relate to the >> transition to /lib32. >> >> In debian/rules.conf we have: >> >> libc_ver := 2.5 >>

Re: Depencencies of gcc on glibc/eglibc and libc6-i386

2009-08-30 Thread Matthias Klose
On 29.08.2009 18:38, Ludovic Brenta wrote: I would like to better understand the depencencies between the various gcc packages and libc6{,-i386}, in particular as they relate to the transition to /lib32. In debian/rules.conf we have: libc_ver := 2.5 ifneq (,$(findstring gnat,$(PKGSOURCE))) l

Depencencies of gcc on glibc/eglibc and libc6-i386

2009-08-29 Thread Ludovic Brenta
I would like to better understand the depencencies between the various gcc packages and libc6{,-i386}, in particular as they relate to the transition to /lib32. In debian/rules.conf we have: libc_ver := 2.5 ifneq (,$(findstring gnat,$(PKGSOURCE))) libc_ver := 2.9-21 endif This variable generat